Reference health
The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
1 of 46 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-02
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1787/9789264115620-3-en
The 45 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/1467-8276.00041
Productivity Growth and Environmental Regulation in Mexican and U.S. Food Manufacturing
resolves10.15173/esr.v14i2.493
Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.4337/9781781953020.00009
An Empirical Study of Environmental R & D: What Encourages Facilities to be Environmentally Innovative?
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(90)90051-y
The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effects
resolves10.1162/00346530152480144
Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Evidence from Oil Refineries
resolves10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00058-x
Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries
resolves10.1177/1070496503256500
Examining the Evidence on Environmental Regulations and Industry Location
resolves10.1162/jiec.2006.10.4.95
Strategic Responses to Environmental Regulation in the U.K. Automotive Sector: The European Union End-of-Life Vehicle Directive and the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00053-0
Strategic environmental policy; eco-dumping or a green strategy?
resolves10.1006/jeem.1995.1007
Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data
resolves10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u206576
Brentford, 1st Viscount, (William Joynson Hicks) (23 June 1865–8 June 1932)
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2004.09.004
Abatement costs in response to the Swedish charge on nitrogen oxide emissions
resolves10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts
resolves10.1006/jeem.1996.0955
Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions
resolves10.1080/10438590801943235
The environmental Porter hypothesis: theory, evidence, and a model of timing of adoption
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(95)00853-5
Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology
resolves10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00301.x
Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1007/s11123-008-0108-4
Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis
resolves10.1787/5kmfwjvc83vk-en
Differentiated Intellectual Property Regimes for Environmental and Climate Technologies
resolves10.3368/le.84.4.689
Distribution of Environmental Costs and Benefits, Additional Distortions, and the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.2307/2109447
Differential Environmental Regulation: Effects on Electric Utility Capital Turnover and Emissions
resolves10.1257/jep.9.4.119
Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2005.04.006
International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany
resolves10.3368/le.86.2.329
The Effect of Clean Water Regulation on Profitability: Testing the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1080/05775132.1997.11471950
Has Environmental Protection Really Reduced Productivity Growth?
resolves10.1006/jeem.1998.1061
Environmental Policy and Competitiveness: The Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedQuand la r�glementation environnementale profite aux pollueurs. Survol des fondements th�oriques de l'Hypoth�se de Porter
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedA Managerial Perspective on the Porter Hypothesis: The Case of CO 2 Emissions
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental Regulation and International Competitiveness: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedCompetitiveness and Environmental Policies for Agriculture: Testing the Porter Hypothesis
no DOI — not checkedAmerica's Green Strategy
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedA Comparative Analysis of Theoretical Reasoning and Empirical Studies on the Porter Hypothesis and the Role of Innovation, mimeo
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-02 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1754674"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1754674/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1754674)