Reference health

National Implementation of ECHR Rights: Kant’s Categorical Imperative and the Convention

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1818845
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 60 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-29

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

133 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1787/mei-v2018-11-table67-fr
The 59 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3726/978-3-653-02186-8/9
Conclusions
resolves10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u175933
Trevor, Elleston, (17 Feb. 1920–21 July 1995), author
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199541393.001.0001
Principles of French Law
resolves10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u18771
Hamilton, Sir Edward (Sydney), (14 April 1925–21 Dec. 2008)
resolves10.1093/oso/9780198765134.001.0001
French Administrative Law
resolves10.1007/978-3-322-85220-5
Einführung innovativer Systemgeschäfte
resolves10.1163/9789004219915_037
The European Convention of Human Rights and Its Member States
resolves10.18261/issn.1504-3061
Lov og Rett
resolves10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u197504
Hansard, Col Arthur Clifton, (11 June 1855–6 Jan. 1927), retired, late Royal Artillery
resolves10.1093/yel/29.1.3
Peaceful or Problematic? The Relationship between National Supreme Courts and Supranational Courts in Europe
resolves10.1080/13642989808406730
Case of Raninen v. Finland
resolves10.3153/jfscom.2009030
Age and growth, reproduction and diet of the black goby, (Gobius niger) from Aegean Sea, Turkey
resolves10.1163/157181302760446348
Morris v. The United Kingdom
resolves10.5040/9781472560490.ch-007
Blackstone and Bentham on the Law of Marriage
resolves10.1163/ej.9789004157750.i-952.114
Prosecutor v. Anto Furundija
resolves10.1163/2210-7886_asc-19359
19359, 1849-05-04, DÉCADON (Louis Pierre Marie Paulin Hippolyte, Marquis de MONTCALM), Montpellier
resolves10.1093/nq/s11-iv.82.74d
Wait and see
resolves10.1017/s2071832200018678
The Effects of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights According to the German Constitutional Court
resolves10.1017/cbo9781316151525.073
Jürgensen <i>v</i>. German Federal Republic.
resolves10.4000/assr.2681
American Evangelical Christianity. An Introduction (cf. Arch. supra. Sébastien Fath)
resolves10.1016/s0939-3889(15)70613-6
Neue Bücher
resolves10.7312/gran92318-025
24. Factors Promoting Polyploidy
resolves10.1628/jz-2010-0017
Wirkungen eines Urteils des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte – am Beispiel des Falls M. gegen Deutschland
resolves10.1017/s2071832200020095
Incompatible Contrasts? — Preventive Detention in Germany and the European Convention on Human Rights
resolves10.1007/bf01484515
Neue Spezialit�ten
resolves10.1628/002268814x14025650857123
Tagungsbericht – Parteienwissenschaften
resolves10.1039/c8cp91937b
Inside front cover
resolves10.1017/s2042171000000273
Note on Transcription and Editing
resolves10.31857/s013207690002196-7
The Constitution of the Russian Federation – the legal basis the integration of Russian society
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566181.003.0012
The General and the Particular: Parliament and the Courts under the Scheme of the European Convention on Human Rights
resolves10.1787/888932673638
United Kingdom: Country note
resolves10.1177/030857591103500311
Northern Ireland: The Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995: Article 50, Care Proceedings
resolves10.5771/9783845296029-177
Unternehmen und Beweis – Verwertbarkeit von Erkenntnissen aus internen Untersuchungen im Lichte der VW-Entscheidung des BVerfG
resolves10.1515/fa-2015-1104
Die Entscheidung des BVerfG vom 06.10.2015
resolves10.1515/9783899495898.63
Fall 4: Verfilmung einer tatsächlich begangenen Straftat
resolves10.1628/jz-2018-0311
BVerfG, Urteil v. 18. 7.2018 – 1 BvR 1675/16, 745/17, 836/17, 981/17
resolves10.5771/9783845268187-175
Die Rechtmäßigkeit des Solange-Prinzips des BverfG Zur Kompetenz des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zur Beschränkung seiner eigenen Zuständigkeit
resolves10.1628/jz-2019-0035
BVerfG, Beschluss v. 23. 10. 2018 – 1 BvR 2523/13, 595/14
resolves10.1515/9783110924268.220
34 Parteiausschluss wegen Scientology-Mitgliedschaft. BVerfG, Beschluss vom 28.3.2002 (2 BvR 307/01)
resolves10.5771/0531-2485-2006-1-101
Diener dreier Herren? – Der Instanzrichter zwischen BVerfG, EuGH und EGMR
resolves10.1007/s10357-010-2003-9
Normenkontrollantrag in Sachen “Gentechnikgesetz”
resolves10.1628/002268814x14163956773214
Absprachen im Strafprozess – ein Jahr nach der Entscheidung des BVerfG
resolves10.1628/jz-2018-0018
BVerfG, Beschluss v. 10. 10. 2017 – 1 BvR 2019/16.
resolves10.5771/9783845256993_13
Einführung
resolves10.9785/gesr-2015-0109
Chefarzt: katholisch, geschieden, wiederverheiratet – Kündigung? – (BVerfG v. 22.10.2014)
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2326987
Proportionality and Deference: The Importance of a Structured Approach
resolves10.1017/s0008197306007082
PROPORTIONALITY AND VARIABLE INTENSITY OF REVIEW
resolves10.1093/he/9780191842832.003.0035
R (on the application of Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26, House of Lords
resolves10.1093/yel/27.1.673
European Administrative Law by Jurgen Schwarze (rev edn, Sweet &amp; Maxwell 2006), 1,562 pages,  211, ISBN 9780421965607
resolves10.5040/9781472560766
Public Law after the Human Rights Act
resolves10.1093/he/9780191866128.003.0021
Jeynes v News Magazines Ltd &amp; Another [2008] EWCA Civ 130
resolves10.5771/9783845228792-35
Europa als Gegenstand wissenschaftlicher Reflexion – eine thematische Annäherung in 12 Thesen
resolves10.5771/9783845228792-13
Strukturfragen der Europäischen Union
resolves10.1111/1468-2230.00199
Human Rights and the House of Lords
resolves10.1016/b978-1-84334-146-8.50010-7
Acknowledgments
resolves10.5305/intelegamate.55.3.0474
OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia (Eur. Ct. H.R.)
The 133 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedComparative Law in French Human Rights Cases
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedNorwegian Supreme Court Judgment, see (1999) Norsk Retstidende 961
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedThere is A World Elsewhere
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedThere is A World Elsewhere" -Lord Bingham and Comparative Law
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedWirkung und Rang der EMRK in den Rechtsordnungen der Mitgliedstaaten
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedDie neue Schlagkraft der gemeineurop�sichen Grundrechtsjudikatur' 65 Zeitschrift f�r ausl�ndisches und �ffentliches Recht 35
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedHerausforderung Sicherheitsverwahrung -Wie die Praxis mit der Entscheidung der EGMR (M. gegen Deutschland) umgehen kann'
no DOI — not checkedThe Federal Constitutional Court's Emergency Power to Intervene: Provisional Measures Pursuant to Article 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act
no DOI — not checkedref86
no DOI — not checkedref87
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedref91
no DOI — not checkedref92
no DOI — not checkedref93
no DOI — not checkedref94
no DOI — not checkedref95
no DOI — not checkedref96
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedref98
no DOI — not checkedref99
no DOI — not checkedref101
no DOI — not checkedref102
no DOI — not checkedThe Federal Russian Law on Foreign Treaties
no DOI — not checkedref105
no DOI — not checkedOthers at [6] (see also the translation by K. Koroteev and S. Golubok 'Judgment of the Russian Constitutional Court on Supervisory Review in Civil Proceedings: Denial of Justice, Denial of Europe
no DOI — not checkedref107
no DOI — not checkedThe Futility of the Human Right Act
no DOI — not checkedref109
no DOI — not checkedref110
no DOI — not checkedref111
no DOI — not checkedref113
no DOI — not checkedref114
no DOI — not checkedref115
no DOI — not checked271; Dickson v. HM Advocate
no DOI — not checkedref117
no DOI — not checkedref120
no DOI — not checkedref121
no DOI — not checkedref122
no DOI — not checkedref123
no DOI — not checkedref124
no DOI — not checkedref126
no DOI — not checkedref128
no DOI — not checkedref129
no DOI — not checkedref131
no DOI — not checkedDecision number 85-192 Conseil constitutionnel
no DOI — not checkedDecision number 92-316 Conseil constitutionnel
no DOI — not checkedref137
no DOI — not checkedref138
no DOI — not checkedref139
no DOI — not checkedref141
no DOI — not checkedref143
no DOI — not checkedSee also BVerfG
no DOI — not checkedref151
no DOI — not checkedref152
no DOI — not checkedref154
no DOI — not checkedref156
no DOI — not checkedref157
no DOI — not checkedref159
no DOI — not checkedVI ECHR 294 ; see also K. Ziegler, 'Privacy after Caroline von Hannover v Germany
no DOI — not checkedref164
no DOI — not checkedref165
no DOI — not checkedref166
no DOI — not checkedref169
no DOI — not checkedProportionality, Deference, Wednesbury
no DOI — not checkedref171
no DOI — not checkedref172
no DOI — not checkedref173
no DOI — not checkedref174
no DOI — not checkedref175
no DOI — not checkedref176
no DOI — not checkedref177
no DOI — not checkedref178
no DOI — not checkedref179
no DOI — not checkedref180
no DOI — not checkedref182
no DOI — not checkedref183
no DOI — not checkedref184
no DOI — not checkedref186
no DOI — not checkedref187
no DOI — not checkedref188
no DOI — not checkedAdministrative Law (6th edn
no DOI — not checkedref192
no DOI — not checkedref193
no DOI — not checkedref194
no DOI — not checkedref197
no DOI — not checkedref198
no DOI — not checkedAssessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems
no DOI — not checkedref202
no DOI — not checkedref205
no DOI — not checkedref206
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1818845"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1818845/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1818845/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1818845)