Reference health
30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship
2 of 86 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-21
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1001/jama.277.15.1224
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/s0048-7333(04)00019-8
The 84 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x
When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00108-2
Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004
Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.013
Implementing Bayh–Dole-like laws: Faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activity
resolves10.5465/amle.2009.44287937
Bridging the Valley of Death: Lessons Learned From 14 Years of Commercialization of Technology Education.
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.008
The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.009
Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x
A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university‐industry relationships
resolves10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004
Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions
resolves10.5465/amle.2009.44287941
New Trends in Technology Management Education: A View From Europe.
resolves10.1016/s0733-558x(06)25007-9
From Vulnerable to Venerated: The Institutionalization of Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00078-1
Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States
resolves10.1023/b:jott.0000034126.23592.23
Overcoming Weak Entrepreneurial Infrastructures for Academic Spin-Off Ventures
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?
resolves10.1007/s10961-008-9093-z
Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives
resolves10.1080/00213624.2001.11506393
The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences?
resolves10.1111/1467-9310.00248
Assessing collaborative, pre‐competitive R&D projects: the case of the UK LINK scheme
resolves10.1162/003465398557221
Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988
resolves10.1093/icc/dth064
Organizing venture capital: the rise and demise of American Research & Development Corporation, 1946–1973
resolves10.2307/2118401
Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations
resolves10.1093/icc/dtm017
Technology transfer offices as institutional entrepreneurs: the case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human embryonic stem cells
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007
Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity
resolves10.1093/icc/8.1.67
Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.001
The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.007
Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model
resolves10.1111/j.1944-8287.2005.tb00265.x
Entrepreneurial Geographies: Support Networks in Three High-Technology Industries
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.014
The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university–industry linkages—An empirical study of TAMA in Japan
resolves10.1007/s10961-010-9182-7
The internationalization of science and its influence on academic entrepreneurship
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(95)00857-8
‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration
resolves10.1093/icc/dtm020
An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.010
The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006
Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies
resolves10.1023/A:1011106006976
Entrepreneurship, Secrecy, and Productivity: A Comparison of Clinical and Non-Clinical Life Sciences Faculty
resolves10.1007/s10961-006-0003-y
Who Develops a University Invention? The Impact of Tacit Knowledge and Licensing Policies
resolves10.3152/147154403781776735
Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00094-8
Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(95)00828-4
Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms
resolves10.1353/tech.2006.0085
Corporations, Universities, and Instrumental Communities: Commercializing Probe Microscopy, 1981-1996
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00203.x
From Human Capital to Social Capital: A Longitudinal Study of Technology–Based Academic Entrepreneurs
resolves10.1007/s10961-004-4361-z
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University?Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?
resolves10.1007/s10961-006-9011-1
Academic patents and materials transfer agreements: substitutes or complements?
resolves10.1007/s10961-009-9113-7
Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.11.001
Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.023
Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00111-7
From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009
Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry
resolves10.2139/ssrn.900605
The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned, Managerial and Policy Implications, and the Road Forward
resolves10.5465/amle.8.3.zqr324
New Developments in Technology Management Education: Background Issues, Program Initiatives, and a Research Agenda
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x
The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Longitudinal Study of University Spin‐Off Venture Emergence
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2004.11.006
University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00111-1
Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00196-2
Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study
resolves10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies
resolves10.1093/oxrep/grm036
Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.0060262
Is Bayh-Dole Good for Developing Countries? Lessons from the US Experience
resolves10.1086/502691
When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences
resolves10.5465/amle.8.3.zqr389
An Integrated Approach to Educating Professionals for Careers in Innovation
resolves10.1177/0891242402016002001
Analyzing an Innovative Environment: San Diego as a Bioscience Beachhead
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.006
Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00261.x
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND EUROPEAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010
Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021
Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries
resolves10.1023/b:jott.0000034124.70363.83
The Formation of High-Tech University Spinouts: The Role of Joint Ventures and Venture Capital Investors
resolves10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.09.001
How do threshold firms sustain corporate entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedTechnology transfer from Italian universities: Is an entrepreneurial model starting up?
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedThe role of the university: leveraging talent, not technology
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedThe university as innovator: Bumps in the road
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref83
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedref103
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-21 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1821239"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1821239/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1821239)