Reference health

Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis: Environmental Innovations and Firm-Profitability

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1865249
CiteStamped reference-health badge
36/36 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/s0165-1765(02)00005-8
A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis
resolves10.1086/262123
Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries
resolves10.1162/00346530152480144
Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Evidence from Oil Refineries
resolves10.1561/101.00000020
Environmental Policy Without Costs? A Review of the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00058-x
Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries
resolves10.1177/1070496503256500
Examining the Evidence on Environmental Regulations and Industry Location
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(81)90048-6
The contribution of environmental regulations to the slowdown in productivity growth
resolves10.1080/00036840701749019
On the profitability of innovative assets
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00236.x
Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy
resolves10.2307/2555757
The Profitability of Innovating Firms
resolves10.1086/261170
Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-fueled Electric Power Generation
resolves10.1111/1467-6451.00070
Environmental Regulation, Investment Timing, and Technology Choice
resolves10.3386/w8484
The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 & 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufactures
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.x
Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1268227
A Test of the Quality of Concentration Indices
resolves10.3386/w5118
Effects of Air Quality Regulation
resolves10.1162/003465397557196
Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study
resolves10.1111/1467-6451.00203
Policy‐Induced Technology Adoption: Evidence from the U.S. Lead Phasedown
resolves10.1162/00346530151143815
Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(95)00853-5
Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology
resolves10.1162/003465303772815844
Effects of Environmental Regulations on Manufacturing Plant Births: Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator
resolves10.1006/jeem.2000.1166
Technical Change, External Economies, and the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1162/003355399556188
The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change
resolves10.1177/1536867x0400400206
Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models
resolves10.1257/jep.9.4.119
Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?
resolves10.1002/pam.10159
Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990
resolves10.2202/1538-0645.1423
Uncertain R&D and the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.3386/w14832
Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change
resolves10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
resolves10.1007/s10640-009-9318-0
Does the Porter Hypothesis Explain Expected Future Financial Performance? The Effect of Clean Water Regulation on Chemical Manufacturing Firms
resolves10.2307/1924405
Structure-Profit Relationship at the Line of Business and Industry Level
resolves10.1016/s1573-448x(89)02004-2
Chapter 16 Inter-industry studies of structure and performance
resolves10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3
The Theory of Economic Development
resolves10.2307/1927492
The Elements of Market Structure
resolves10.1257/000282803321947470
The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Technology Diffusion: The Case of Chlorine Manufacturing
resolves10.1006/jeem.1998.1061
Environmental Policy and Competitiveness: The Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref45
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1865249"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1865249/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1865249/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1865249)