Reference health
Discrete-Choice-Experimente Zur Ermittlung Der Präferenzen Für Umverteilung
56/56 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-20
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
26 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 56 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/aer.97.4.1507
Good-Bye Lenin (or Not?): The Effect of Communism on People's Preferences
resolves10.1002/hec.1587
Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment
resolves10.1162/00335530151144078
Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis
resolves10.1111/1468-0327.00069
Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens
resolves10.1016/s1574-0714(06)01008-6
Chapter 8 The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00141-9
Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution
resolves10.3386/w15064
Do Race and Fairness Matter in Generosity? Evidence from a Nationally Representative Charity Experiment
resolves10.1007/978-1-4020-5753-3_8
The Price Proxy in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues of Relevance for Future Research
resolves10.2307/1882024
The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.12.009
Are church and state substitutes? Evidence from the 1996 welfare reform
resolves10.1006/jeem.1997.1002
Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs
resolves10.1177/002224379403100408
Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications
resolves10.1177/002224378302000403
Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data
resolves10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-x
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
resolves10.2139/ssrn.562982
Eliciting Consumers Preferences Using Stated Preference Discrete Choice Models: Contingent Ranking Versus Choice Experiment
resolves10.1016/s0176-2680(00)00014-8
The median-voter hypothesis, income inequality, and income redistribution: an empirical test with the required data
resolves10.1093/cesifo/ifr002
Do Religious Beliefs Explain Preferences for Income Redistribution? Experimental Evidence
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1445432
Economic Well-Being, Social Mobility and Preferences for Income Redistribution: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(98)00072-3
Types and patterns: an experimental East-West-German comparison of cooperation and solidarity
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2007.09.011
Subjective income and employment expectations and preferences for redistribution
resolves10.1016/0047-2727(75)90016-x
Individual welfare, majority voting, and the properties of a linear income tax
resolves10.1111/1467-9485.00176
Sensitivity of Willingness to Pay Estimates to the Level of Attributes in Discrete Choice Experiments
resolves10.1017/s0898588x06000071
The Political Economy of Religion and Social Insurance in the United States, 1910–1939
The 26 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedAn experimental test of preferences for the distribution of income and individual risk aversion
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedValidating Conjoint and Hedonic Preference Measures: Evidence from Valuing Reductions in Risk
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedDie Ungleichheit w�chst in den meisten L�ndern
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedDesign and Analysis of Simulated Choice or Allocation Experiments in Travel Choice Modelling
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedIs the Welfare State Sustainable?
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedDoes Distributional Skewness Lead to Redistribution?
no DOI — not checkedref80
no DOI — not checkedref81
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-20 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1868197"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1868197/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1868197)