Reference health
The Role of Aid for Trade in the European Union’s Development Policy
28/28 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
23 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.04.005
Trade and Development: Lessons from Vietnam’s Past Trade Agreements
resolves10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.11.001
EU Economic Partnership Agreements and WTO negotiations. A quantitative assessment of trade preference granting and erosion in the banana market
resolves10.14217/9781848598775-4-en
An Analysis of EU-ACP Aid Flows Through the EDF from Lomé I to the Cotonou Agreement and Proposals for the 10th and 11th EDFs
resolves10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00422.x
The Economic Partnership Agreements: Rationale, Misperceptions and Non‐trade Aspects
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1147611
The Aid Effectiveness Literature - The Sad Result of 40 Years of Research
resolves10.5771/9783845265575-461
§ 20 Council Authority pursuant to Article 87(3)(e) EC and Article 88(2) EC
resolves10.4324/9781315199771-5
The Politics of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: Theory and Practice
resolves10.1080/07036330500190107
A Triumph of Realism over Idealism? Cooperation Between the European Union and Africa
resolves10.1111/j.0378-5920.2004.00654.x
Economic Partnership Agreements Between Sub‐Saharan Africa and the EU: A Development Perspective
resolves10.1080/713701373
Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and acp states and the end of the Lome´ Convention
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-3566
Trade Preferences and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries : A Selective Survey
resolves10.54648/TRAD2005041
Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Trade Liberalization: A Viable Answer for Economic Development?
resolves10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00421.x
Economic Partnership Agreements: A ‘Historic Step’ Towards a ‘Partnership of Equals’?
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-5265
Aid For Trade, Infrastructure, And The Growth Effects Of Trade Reform : Issues And Implications For Caribbean Countries
resolves10.1163/1569206043505220
Managing Development: EU and African Relations through the Evolution of the Lomé and Cotonou Agreements
resolves10.1111/1467-7679.00175
Does Export Promotion Increase Economic Growth? Some Cross‐Section Evidence
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01437.x
Does Aid for Trade Enhance Export Performance? Investigating the Infrastructure Channel
The 23 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedFDI and trade in Portugal: a gravity analysis
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedHas the Lom� Convention failed ACP trade
no DOI — not checkedGreen Paper on relations between the European Union and the ACP countries on the eve of the 21st century. Challenges and options for a new partnership
no DOI — not checkedThe European Consensus on Development
no DOI — not checkedCommission Staff Working Document, SEC(2010) 419 final
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedIs the EU's governance 'good'? An assessment of EU governance in its partnership with ACP states
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedProceedings of the Challenges for analysis of the economy, business, and social progress
no DOI — not checkedR�gi-�j" fejleszt�si eszk�z az Eur�pai Uni�ban. (Aid for Trade
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedDoha Work Programme, Ministerial Declaration in Hong Kong
no DOI — not checkedRecommendations of the Task Force on Aid for Trade. WT/AFT/1, World Trade Organization
no DOI — not checkedref51
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1928889"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1928889/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1928889)