At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
The 49 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00056-6The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences
resolves10.1093/ser/mwi013How do financial markets affect industrial relations: an institutional complementarity approach
resolves10.2307/1556407ORGANIZATIONAL AND HRM STRATEGIES IN KOREA: IMPACT ON FIRM PERFORMANCE IN AN EMERGING ECONOMY.
resolves10.1177/001979390105400228The Effect of High-Performance Work Practices on Employee Earnings in the Steel, Apparel, and Medical Electronics and Imaging Industries
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn054.raReturns to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Clinical Study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund
resolves10.1093/ser/mwj037Anglo-American corporate governance and the employment relationship: a case to answer?
resolves10.1080/713769651High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: the strength of variable, contingent and context-bound relationships
resolves10.2139/ssrn.942232The Effects of the National Setting on Employment Practice: The Case of Downsizing
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2338.2006.00415.xA cool response to the ICE Regulations? Employer and trade union approaches to the new legal framework for information and consultation
resolves10.3917/rel.744.0541The Stock Market and Human Resource Management: Evidence from a Survey of French Establishments
resolves10.2139/ssrn.918121Leveraged Buyouts in the U.K. And Continental Europe: Retrospect and Prospect
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedWho writes the rules for hostile takeovers, and why? -the peculiar divergence of US and UK takeover regulation
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedIs the "Modernisation" of Company Law a Threat to Employee Voice within the Enterprise? A British Perspective
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedInside the Workplace: Findings from the
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checked1. individually, with each employee directly concerned? Yes (1) or No (0) 2. at the working unit level? Yes (1) or No (0) 3. collectively, with all the employees concerned? Yes (1) or No (0) 4. with some or all of the worker representatives? Yes (1) or No (0) What was the objective of those discussions: 5
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.