Reference health
The Information Dynamics of Vertical Stare Decisis
36/36 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/106591298003300205
Responses of Federal District Judges to Court of Appeals Policies: An Exploration
resolves10.1111/1468-2508.00138
Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent
resolves10.1111/jels.12012
The Citation and Depreciation of <scp>U</scp>.<scp>S</scp>. Supreme Court Precedent
resolves10.2307/2082885
Adaptive Signal Processing, Hierarchy, and Budgetary Control in Federal Regulation
resolves10.2307/2586383
Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions
resolves10.1093/pan/mpm011
Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court
resolves10.1177/106591290105400307
Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas
resolves10.1111/1540-5893.3701004
Appellate Court Supervision in the Federal Judiciary: A Hierarchical Perspective
resolves10.1177/106591290405700204
Information Provision, Organizational Constraints, and the Decision to Submit an Amicus Curiae Brief in a U.S. Supreme Court Case
resolves10.2307/2111744
The Institutional Dynamics of Policy Administration: Bureaucratic Influence over Securities Regulation
resolves10.2307/2960277
Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success
resolves10.2307/2938746
Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036930
Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control
resolves10.1177/1532673x08317286
Strategic Anticipation and the Hierarchy of Justice in U.S. District Courts
resolves10.2307/2131281
The Impact of the Supreme Court on Trends in Economic Policy Making in the United States Courts of Appeals
resolves10.2307/2111602
The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions
resolves10.2307/448368
Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00465.x
Strategic Defiance and Compliance in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedMeasuring Legal Change: The Reliability and Validity of Shepard's Citations
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1932804"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1932804/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1932804)