Reference health
The Transition Towards Entrepreneurial Universities: An Assessment of Academic Entrepreneurship in Italy
49/49 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 49 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.007
Faculty support for the objectives of university–industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity
resolves10.1007/s11192-006-0159-0
The Act on inventions at public research institutions: Danish universities' patenting activity
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004
Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002
resolves10.2139/ssrn.46909
Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks Versus Stock Markets
resolves10.1057/emr.2008.9
University patenting and scientific productivity: a quantitative study of Italian academic inventors
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.007
If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.007
Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence
resolves10.3152/095820207x254439
Patent and publication activities of German professors: an empirical assessment of their co-activity
resolves10.5367/000000003773007265
Comparative Study of Technology Transfer Practices in Europe and the USA
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.013
Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs
resolves10.1023/A:1021674618658
University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?
resolves10.3152/030234208x329095
From ivory tower to factory floor? How universities are changing to meet the needs of industry
resolves10.1080/00213624.2001.11506393
The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences?
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.008
Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting
resolves10.1007/s10961-006-0002-z
Return on Investment in Innovation: Implications for Institutions and National Agencies*
resolves10.1023/A:1011153922906
Designing Efficient Institutions for Science-Based Entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden
resolves10.1007/s11192-007-0209-2
A baseline for the impact of academic patenting legislation in Norway
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00024-6
Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006
Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies
resolves10.3152/147154403781776735
Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness
resolves10.1007/s11192-005-0207-1
Inventive output of academic research: A comparison of two science systems
resolves10.1007/s11192-007-0207-4
Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations
resolves10.1007/s10961-004-4361-z
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University?Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?
resolves10.1016/s0167-7187(03)00088-2
When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive?
resolves10.1023/A:1007892413701
To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009
Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.005
Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge
resolves10.3152/147154306781779136
Guest editorial: The sealing of university intellectual property boundaries and the ceiling of academic entrepreneurial tolerance
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00196-2
Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study
resolves10.1093/oxrep/grm036
Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications
resolves10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416
The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing
resolves10.1007/s10961-006-9015-x
Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights
resolves10.3152/147154302781781029
An evolutionary Triple Helix to strengthen academy-industry relations: suggestions from European regions
resolves10.1016/s0166-4972(97)00094-1
Inventions and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers University of Technology
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021
Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedIl trasferimento di conoscenze tecnologiche dall'universit� all'industria in Italia: nuova evidenza sui brevetti di paternit� dei docenti
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedInside or outside the IP-system
no DOI — not checkedThe role of the university: Leveraging talent, not technology
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedUniversities and the third mission: a systematic review of research on external engagement by academic researchers. Imperial College Working Paper Phan and D.S. Siegel. 2006. The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned, managerial and policy implications, and the road forward
no DOI — not checkedref51
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1979450"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1979450/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1979450)