Reference health
The Pretty Good Analyst
2 of 60 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2290350
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2291091
The 58 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00336
Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.001
Buys, holds, and sells: The distribution of investment banks’ stock ratings and the implications for the profitability of analysts’ recommendations
resolves10.1111/jofi.12107
Are Analysts’ Recommendations Informative? Intraday Evidence on the Impact of Time Stamp Delays
resolves10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1073
Analyst Information Processing, Financial Regulation, and Academic Research
resolves10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:vofeit>2.0.co;2
VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679x.2006.00217.x
Favorable versus Unfavorable Recommendations: The Impact on Analyst Access to Management‐Provided Information
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2803324
Does Limited Attention Matter in Security Analysis? Evidence from Analysts' Reliance on Categories
resolves10.1007/bf00162520
Accelerating Monte Carlo Markov chain convergence for cumulative-link generalized linear models
resolves10.1111/1475-679x.00040
The Association between Trading Recommendations and Broker‐Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00469.x
The Client Is King: Do Mutual Fund Relationships Bias Analyst Recommendations?
resolves10.2307/2491360
The Relative Informativeness of Analysts' Stock Recommendations and Earnings Forecast Revisions
resolves10.2307/2109766
Alternative Computational Approaches to Inference in the Multinomial Probit Model
resolves10.1016/s0304-4076(97)00005-5
Statistical inference in the multinomial multiperiod probit model
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.002
Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting
resolves10.1111/1540-6261.00526
Analyzing the Analysts: Career Concerns and Biased Earnings Forecasts
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn109
Conflicts of Interest and Stock Recommendations: The Effects of the Global Settlement and Related Regulations
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2354.2010.00606.x
A COMPUTATIONALLY PRACTICAL SIMULATION ESTIMATION ALGORITHM FOR DYNAMIC PANEL DATA MODELS WITH UNOBSERVED ENDOGENOUS STATE VARIABLES*
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1441802
What Drives the Value of Analysts' Recommendations: Earnings Estimates or Discount Rate Estimates?
resolves10.1016/s0165-4101(98)00016-0
Underwriting relationships, analysts' earnings forecasts and investment recommendations
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00837.x
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.12.004
Conflicts of interest in sell-side research and the moderating role of institutional investors
resolves10.1093/rfs/12.4.653
Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst Recommendations
resolves10.1198/106186005x48687
An Autoregressive Ordered Probit Model With Application to High-Frequency Financial Data
resolves10.3982/ecta7292
Inference in Dynamic Discrete Choice Models With Serially Correlated Unobserved State Variables
resolves10.1506/f2mw-d22d-wnqq-d034
Horizon‐Dependent Underreaction in Financial Analysts' Earnings Forecasts*
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1990.tb00810.x
On the incentives for security analysts to revise their earnings forecasts*
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05205.x
Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedImplementing Bayesian Methods in Forensic Science
no DOI — not checkedEvaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments
no DOI — not checkedref55
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1984674"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1984674/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1984674)