Reference health
Institution and Efficiency in Transition Economies
1 of 34 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-22
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1257/002205102760273797
The 33 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.08.004
Sources of Growth Revisited: Evidence from Selected MENA Countries
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models
resolves10.1007/bf01205442
A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data
resolves10.1016/j.ibusrev.2003.05.005
Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies
resolves10.1080/00220380600742183
Fixed capital stock depreciation in developing countries: Some evidence from firm level data
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01739.x
INSTITUTIONS, INVESTMENT, AND GROWTH: NEW CROSS‐COUNTRY AND PANEL DATA EVIDENCE
resolves10.1023/A:1009830421147
A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation of the Aggregate Production Function Specification
resolves10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.06.001
A comparison of aggregation methods for measures of economic freedom
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x
INSTITUTIONS AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: CROSS‐COUNTRY TESTS USING ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES
resolves10.1016/s0165-1765(03)00173-3
The specification of the aggregate production function in the presence of inefficiency
resolves10.2307/2525757
Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error
resolves10.1007/s10101-004-0080-z
Does better governance foster efficiency? An aggregate frontier analysis
resolves10.1007/978-1-4615-0439-9_3
The Relative Levels and the Character of Institutional Development in Transition Economies
resolves10.1023/A:1005067115159
Governance and Growth: A Simple Hypothesis Explaining Cross-Country Differences in Productivity Growth
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-2341
The Tyranny of Concepts: CUDIE (Cumulated, Depreciated Investment Effort) Is Not Capital
resolves10.1007/bf02699764
Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them
resolves10.1023/b:cris.0000016225.75792.02
Democracy and political corruption: A cross-national comparison
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedThe Benefits of Economic Freedom: A Survey
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedFiscal Policy and Economic Growth. An Empirical Investigation
no DOI — not checkedEconomic Freedom and the Environment for Economic Growth
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedIndex of Economic Freedom, The Heritage Foundation
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2016251"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2016251/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2016251)