Reference health

Social Comparisons and Life Satisfaction Across Racial and Ethnic Groups: The Effects of Status, Information and Solidarity

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2045902
CiteStamped reference-health badge
34/34 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 34 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00369.x
Money, Sex and Happiness: An Empirical Study
resolves10.2307/2111620
Residential Context and Racial Solidarity among African Americans
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.07.001
Relative to What or Whom? The Importance of Norms and Relative Standing to Well-Being in South Africa
resolves10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.425
Conspicuous Consumption and Race<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1007/s11109-005-5880-5
Racial Solidarity and Political Participation
resolves10.1016/0047-2727(95)01564-7
Satisfaction and comparison income
resolves10.1257/jel.46.1.95
Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02236.x
Job Satisfaction and Co‐worker Wages: Status or Signal?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2048076
Own-Sector and Inter-Sector Tunnel Effects: Implications for the Effects of Growth and Inequality on Happiness
resolves10.1080/01419870.1981.9993350
The emerging black middle class: Class conscious or race conscious?*
resolves10.1016/b978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7
Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence
resolves10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-b
Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00646
Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x
How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness?
resolves10.1017/s0003055404041346
Putting Race in Context: Identifying the Environmental Determinants of Black Racial Attitudes
resolves10.1016/B978-0-444-53187-2.00003-6
Preferences for Status
resolves10.2307/2647508
Pro-Black Doesn't Mean Anti-White: The Structure of African-American Group Identity
resolves10.2307/1882024
The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development
resolves10.2307/2167981
Marking: Race, Race-making, and the Writing of History
resolves10.1177/0021934707299642
Black Solidarity and Racial Context
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2007.03.004
Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-4820
A Curse Of Comparison? Evidence On Reference Groups For Relative Income Concerns
resolves10.2307/2786717
Individual and Contextual Influences on Group Identification
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00692.x
Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods
resolves10.1162/003355305774268255
Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being*
resolves10.1126/science.1180606
Objective Confirmation of Subjective Measures of Human Well-Being: Evidence from the U.S.A.
resolves10.1007/s00148-010-0322-z
If happiness is relative, against whom do we compare ourselves? Implications for labour supply
resolves10.1007/s11205-010-9740-2
Relative Standing and Subjective Well-Being in South Africa: The Role of Perceptions, Expectations and Income Mobility
resolves10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00064-X
Who wants to redistribute?
resolves10.2307/799653
The Intraracial Attitudes of the Black Middle Class: Have They Changed?
resolves10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00066-5
When information dominates comparison
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00629.x
Ambition and Jealousy: Income Interactions in the ‘Old’ Europe versus the ‘New’ Europe and the United States
resolves10.1080/00064246.1993.11413088
Trends of Opposition to Multiculturalism
resolves10.2307/1924716
The Relativity of Utility: Evidence from Panel Data
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2045902"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2045902/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2045902/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2045902)