Reference health

Making Divorce Easier: The Role of No-Fault and Unilateral Revisited

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2101056
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 13 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2685084
The 12 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00067.x
Marriage, divorce, and legal change: new evidence from England and Wales
resolves10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00078.x
Do Divorce Law Reforms Matter for Divorce Rates? Evidence from Portugal
resolves10.1162/1542476041423359
Does Divorce Law Matter?
resolves10.3386/w6398
Did Unilateral Divorce Raise Divorce Rates? Evidence from Panel Data
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.05.005
The effect of divorce laws on divorce rates in Europe
resolves10.1086/423155
Is Making Divorce Easier Bad for Children? The Long‐Run Implications of Unilateral Divorce
resolves10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00621.x
Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates in Western Europe?
resolves10.1007/s11150-005-3461-3
“Economic Theory’s Stance On No-Fault Divorce”
resolves10.1086/scer.3.1147064
What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does)
resolves10.1093/jleo/ewj008
Marriage Markets and Divorce Laws
resolves10.1257/aer.96.5.1802
Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMarriage and Divorce: Comment
no DOI — not checkedHoe Verloopt een Echtscheiding in Vlaanderen?
no DOI — not checkedHoe Beleven Partners en Kinderen een Echtscheiding?
no DOI — not checkedDe Echtscheiding op Grond van Feitelijke Scheiding
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedMarriage and Divorce: Informational Constraints and Private Contracting
no DOI — not checkedMarriage and divorce: Reply
no DOI — not checkedEchtscheiding op Grond van Vijf Jaar Feitelijk Scheiding: De Wet van 2
no DOI — not checkedref22
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2101056"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2101056/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2101056/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2101056)