Reference health
Just Post It: The Lesson from Two Cases of Fabricated Data Detected by Statistics Alone
5 of 26 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-09-09
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
marked retracted — notice via Crossref, record curated by Retraction Watch10.1086/662139
RETRACTED: Effects of Messiness on Preferences for Simplicity
marked retracted — notice via Crossref, record curated by Retraction Watch10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.013
RETRACTED: Rising up to higher virtues: Experiencing elevated physical height uplifts prosocial actions
marked retracted — notice via Crossref, record curated by Retraction Watch10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02458.x
Construing Collective Concerns
marked retracted — notice via Crossref, record curated by Retraction Watch10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.26
Mixed-motive conflict in social dilemmas: Mood as input to competitive and cooperative goals.
marked retracted — notice via Crossref, record curated by Retraction Watch10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.010
RETRACTED: The effect of color (red versus blue) on assimilation versus contrast in prime-to-behavior effects
The 21 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07128.x
The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity
resolves10.1037//0097-7403.18.3.298
Less-than-expected variability in evidence for primacy and von Restorff effects in rats' nonspatial memory.
resolves10.1002/bdm.628
Decision anomalies, experimenter assumptions, and participants' comprehension: Revaluating the uncertainty effect
resolves10.1017/S1930297500001807
Why are lotteries valued less? Multiple tests of a direct risk-aversion mechanism
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
resolves10.1037/0735-7044.101.1.120
Less-than-expected variability in evidence for three stages in memory formation.
resolves10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.004
Publish (your data) or (let the data) perish! Why not publish your data too?
resolves10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.726
The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis.
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe Law of Anomalous Numbers
no DOI — not checkedThe Two Famous Rabbis Experiments: How Similar Is Too Similar
no DOI — not checkedDirect Risk Aversion: Evidence from Risky Prospects Valued Below Their Worst Outcome
no DOI — not checkedNutritional Supplements and Infection in the Elderly: Why Do the Findings Conflict?
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref32
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2114571"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2114571/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2114571)