Reference health
The Item Count Method for Sensitive Survey Questions: Modelling Criminal Behaviour
1 of 23 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-10-12
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2289219
The 22 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jspi.2006.01.004
Item Count Technique in estimating the proportion of people with a sensitive feature
resolves10.1002/sim.4780080908
A review of methods for misclassified categorical data in epidemiology
resolves10.1093/pan/mpn013
Sensitive Questions, Truthful Answers? Modeling the List Experiment with LISTIT
resolves10.1177/0049124110390768
Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: Experimental Results for the Randomized Response Technique (RRT) and the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT)
resolves10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the
<i>EM</i>
Algorithm
resolves10.1093/poq/nfp065
Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1994490
Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00187.x
THE INTERPLAY OF MORAL NORMS AND INSTRUMENTAL INCENTIVES IN CRIME CAUSATION*
resolves10.1111/j.2517-6161.1979.tb01055.x
Block Total Response as an Alternative to the Randomized Response Method in Surveys
resolves10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
resolves10.1177/0049124103257440
The Analysis of Multivariate Misclassified Data With Special Attention to Randomized Response Data
resolves10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedTrust in justice: Topline findings from the European Social Survey
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedR: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
no DOI — not checkedref32
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-10-12 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2119238"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2119238/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2119238)