Reference health

The Relationship between Economic Preferences and Psychological Personality Measures

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2199369
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 30 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-04

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/h0093360
Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study.
resolves10.3386/w16822
Personality Psychology and Economics
resolves10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.024
Personality and altruism in the dictator game: Relationship to giving to kin, collaborators, competitors, and neutrals
resolves10.1006/game.1995.1027
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
resolves10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.001
The ability to process emotional information predicts loss aversion
resolves10.1353/jhr.2008.0017
The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits
resolves10.3386/w14713
Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion
resolves10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.659
Psychological and Biological Foundations of Time Preference
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00082.x
REPRESENTATIVE TRUST AND RECIPROCITY: PREVALENCE AND DETERMINANTS
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02242.x
Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on Behavioural Outcomes
resolves10.1257/aer.100.3.1238
Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability?
resolves10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES: MEASUREMENT, DETERMINANTS, AND BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES
resolves10.1006/game.1996.0081
Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games
resolves10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00097-1
Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00644.x
Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
A theory of reciprocity
resolves10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.235
On The Economics and Biology of Trust
resolves10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments
resolves10.1257/jel.40.2.351
Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review
resolves10.7551/mitpress/2622.001.0001
The Economics of Risk and Time
resolves10.1162/jeea.2006.4.4.673
EGO UTILITY, OVERCONFIDENCE, AND TASK CHOICE
resolves10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00222-7
Identification of decision rules in experiments on simple games of proposal and response
resolves10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27001-1
Personality Development and Organizational Behavior
resolves10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.015
Back to the future: Personality and Assessment and personality development
resolves10.1037/h0092976
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
resolves10.2307/2967612
A Note on Measurement of Utility
resolves10.2139/ssrn.381380
Maintenance of and Innovation in Long-Term Panel Studies: The Case of the German Socio-Economic Panel (Gsoep)
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1028709
The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Evolution, Scope and Enhancements
resolves10.1017/s1359135510001041
Books received
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedAn online recruitment system for economic experiments
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedCross-products are also calculated between concepts in case more than one concept is included, e.g., in the Big 5-preferences case, we also include the cross-term neuroticicsm*risk. For the ordinary-leastsquares (OLS) models we calculate R 2 , whereas for the ordinal models we calculate pseudo-R 2 . The joint significance of all coefficients is tested using the F-test (OLS models) and the LR-test (ordinal models). All F-and LR-tests are significant at the 1% level. With regard to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), the smallest value for each outcome regression is underlined. Note that the full model (including the Big 5, locus of control and preferences) is chosen by both information criteria in nearly all cases; only for gross wage and unemployment does the BIC indicate that the model with only LoC and LoC 2 included should be used. The number of observations available varies for the different life outcomes: subjective health
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-04 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2199369"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2199369/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2199369/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2199369)