Reference health
Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis: An Empirical Analysis of Green Innovation for the Netherlands
39/39 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 39 checked references that resolve
resolves10.15173/esr.v14i2.493
Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1754674
The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.016
Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis
resolves10.1006/jema.1997.0146
Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach
resolves10.1177/1536867x0600600202
Calculation of Multivariate Normal Probabilities by Simulation, with Applications to Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation
resolves10.1007/s10640-011-9471-0
Market Inertia and the Introduction of Green Products: Can Strategic Effects Justify the Porter Hypothesis?
resolves10.3386/w6696
Research, Innovation, and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level
resolves10.1007/s10640-008-9208-x
Did the Invisible Hand Need a Regulatory Glove to Develop a Green Thumb? Some Historical Perspective on Market Incentives, Win-Win Innovations and the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1023/b:eare.0000031056.93333.3a
Does Environmental Protection Lead to Slower Productivity Growth in the Chemical Industry?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2014612
Environmental Innovation and Employment Dynamics in Different Technology Fields - An Analysis Based on the German Community Innovation Survey 2009
resolves10.1080/10438590801943235
The environmental Porter hypothesis: theory, evidence, and a model of timing of adoption
resolves10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00301.x
Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00466.x
COHERENCY AND COMPLETENESS OF STRUCTURAL MODELS CONTAINING A DUMMY ENDOGENOUS VARIABLE*
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.015
Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy
resolves10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-f
Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing
resolves10.1257/jep.9.4.119
Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1626805
Product, Process and Organizational Innovation: Drivers, Complementarity and Productivity Effects
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1695415
Long-Term Impacts of Environmental Policy and Eco-Innovative Activities of Firms
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1692616
The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance
resolves10.1111/1467-937x.00240
Incomplete Simultaneous Discrete Response Model with Multiple Equilibria
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedICT investment, eco-innovations and environmental efficiency
no DOI — not checkedEco-Innovation: definition, measurement and open research issues
no DOI — not checkedConditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
no DOI — not checkedThe economics of modern manufacturing, technology, strategy and organizations
no DOI — not checkedAmerica's green strategy
no DOI — not checkedUnmasking the Porter hypothesis: Environmental innovations and firm-profitability
no DOI — not checkedThe Porter hypothesis revisited: A literature review of 33 theoretical models and empirical tests
no DOI — not checkedref47
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2202920"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2202920/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2202920)