Reference health
Trans-Substantivity and the Processes of American Law
27/27 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
148 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 27 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/3312053
How Equity Conquered Common Law: The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in Historical Perspective
resolves10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u164472
Geoffrey-Lloyd, Baron, (Geoffrey William Geoffrey-Lloyd) (17 Jan. 1902–12 Sept. 1984)
resolves10.5962/bhl.title.16517
How plants are trained to work for man / by Luther Burbank ; prefatory note by David Starr Jordan.
resolves10.2307/1070037
Federal Procedure. Condemnation Proceedings. In Condemnation Proceedings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 71A(h) District Court Held Justified in Appointing Commission to Determine Issue of Just Compensation
resolves10.1016/j.bushor.2004.07.002
The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act: New tool to fight identity theft
The 148 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedAppellate Review Model of Administrative Law, 111 COLUM
no DOI — not checkedThe Era of Deference: Courts, Expertise, and the Emergence of New Deal Administrative Law, 106 MICH
no DOI — not checkedThe New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: The Last Phase -Underlying Philosophy Embodied in Some of the Basic Provisions of the New Procedure, 23 A
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedThe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Legal Realism as a Jurisprudence of Law Reform, 44 GA
no DOI — not checkedMaking Effective Rules: The Need for Procedure Theory
no DOI — not checkedThe Evolution of Litigation in the Federal Courts of Appeals
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedLimitations, supra note __ at 386. Cf. Emily Sherwin, The Jurisprudence of Pleading: Rights, Rules, and Conley v. Gibson, 52 HOW
no DOI — not checkedFormulation of new theories of legal rights is simpler, virtually by definition, under a pleading system that is not constructed in terms of old legal categories, as was code pleading and common law pleading
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedGeorge and the Dragon": Courts and the Development of the Administrative State in Twentieth Century America
no DOI — not checkedJudicial Review of Procedural Decisions and the Philco Cases: Plus �a Change?, 50 GEO
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedReflections on the Hart and Wechsler Paradigm, 47 VAND
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedThe Neoclassical Revival in Administrative Law
no DOI — not checkedThe Forms and Limits of Adjudication, 92 HARV
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedStill, 126 Until 1990, the law of supplemental jurisdiction was entirely judge-made, notwithstanding the general understanding that Congress had to act to create subject matter jurisdiction. See Wendy Collins Perdue, Finley v. United States: Unstringing Pendent Jurisdiction, 76 VA
no DOI — not checkedWhen the Supreme Court devised its test for when state law claims that depend in significant measure on a federal legal issue arise under federal law for the purposes of federal question jurisdiction, it did not bother interpreting the federal question jurisdiction statute to do so. See generally Grable & Sons Metal Prods
no DOI — not checkedThe central
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedJustice Scalia's Living Textualism and Our Normative Canons, __ COLUM. L. REV. ___ (forthcoming 2013) (draft at 33-34)
no DOI — not checkedEmbracing Administrative Common Law
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedAdministrative Common Law in Judicial Review, 77 TEX
no DOI — not checkedSee generally MASHAW, supra note __ at 289 (describing "[t]he twenty-first century model" of administrative law as one "whose sources are found almost exclusively in general principles derived from judicial review; from transsubstantive statutes that apply to most, if not all, agencies; and, to a much lesser extent
no DOI — not checkedFor an example, see United States v. Nova Scotia Food Prods
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedReprocessing Vermont Yankee, 75 GEO
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedOn the idea of the second-best, see, e.g., Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule, Interpretation and Institutions, 101 MICH
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedcriticizing a Supreme Court decision interpreting the Bankruptcy Code that cloaked a policy-driven result in formalist gloss as "flunk[ing] any requirement of judicial candor")
no DOI — not checkedOne critic of the trans-substantive Federal Rules says that their vagueness, a necessary feature of a trans-substantive system, enables judges to cloak substantive policy preferences in individual case decision-making while employing nominally trans-substantive rules
no DOI — not checkedForeword, Law as Equilibrium, 108 HARV
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedref78
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedThey Saw a Protest": Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction, 64 STAN
no DOI — not checkedBlinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedref83
no DOI — not checkedref84
no DOI — not checkedref86
no DOI — not checkedref87
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedFor commentary similar to what I offer in this paragraph, see generally Jeffrey J. Rachlinski & Cynthia R. Farina, Cognitive Psychology and Optimal Government Design
no DOI — not checkedref91
no DOI — not checkedref92
no DOI — not checkedref93
no DOI — not checkedref94
no DOI — not checkedref95
no DOI — not checkedHeightened Pleading, 81 TEX
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedFor inter-circuit disagreement in another substance-specific pleading context, compare Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp., 12 F.3d 1170, 1176 (2d Cir. 1993) (requiring a securities fraud plaintiff to plead "facts that raise a strong inference of fraudulent intent")
no DOI — not checkedIntersystemic Statutory Interpretation: Methodology as "Law" and the Erie Doctrine, 120 YALE L
no DOI — not checkedShould Courts Give Stare Decisis Effect to Statutory Interpretation Methodology?, 96 GEO
no DOI — not checkedref102
no DOI — not checkedUnconstitutional Rulemaking: The Civil Justice Reform Act and Separation of Powers, 77 MINN
no DOI — not checkedref104
no DOI — not checkedref105
no DOI — not checkedref106
no DOI — not checkedRule 23 Issues Revisited
no DOI — not checkedA specific mass torts rule may seem so laden with substantive overtones as to raise legitimate doubts about the wisdom of invoking regular rulemaking procedures
no DOI — not checkedThe Political Theory of the Class Action, 53 WASH. & LEE L. REV
no DOI — not checkedref111
no DOI — not checkedref112
no DOI — not checkedA View to the Future of Judicial Federalism
no DOI — not checkedref115
no DOI — not checkedCalifornia Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules for Publication of Court of Appeal Opinions
no DOI — not checkedref117
no DOI — not checkedProcedure is a tool, a means to an end and not an end in itself. That end is the application of rules of substantive law to the case in hand
no DOI — not checkedref119
no DOI — not checkedref120
no DOI — not checkedref121
no DOI — not checkedAss'n of the U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut
no DOI — not checkedref127
no DOI — not checkedref128
no DOI — not checkedref131
no DOI — not checkedSpinning Legislative Supremacy, 78 GEO
no DOI — not checkedThe EEOC, the Courts, and Employment Discrimination Policy: Recognizing the Agency's Leading Role in Statutory Interpretation
no DOI — not checkedSuper Statutes, 50 DUKE L
no DOI — not checkedref135
no DOI — not checkedref136
no DOI — not checkedref137
no DOI — not checkedref138
no DOI — not checkedAnother example from textualist interpretive theory is the argument that courts should not use legislative history because it is too time-consuming and burdensome to sift through. Vermeule, supra note __ at 194; id
no DOI — not checkedref141
no DOI — not checkedSmall Things Like Reasons Are Put in a Jar: Reason and Legitimacy in the American State
no DOI — not checkedThe Bureaucratization of the Judiciary, 92 YALE L
no DOI — not checkedref145
no DOI — not checkedThese doctrines reallocate decision-making authority from the comparatively incompetent institution to the better-equipped one; 226 they relieve the decision-maker of authority altogether; 227 they impose bright-line rules that deny decisionmakers discretion when they might exercise it poorly; 228 and they provide heuristics to assist decision-makers as they deal with particularly technical or otherwise demanding problems. 229 Each of the foregoing institutional efficacy goals relates in some manner or another to the legitimacy of litigation and public administration as legal processes
no DOI — not checkedref147
no DOI — not checkedPension Benefit Guar
no DOI — not checkedThe Canons of Statutory Construction and Judicial Preferences, 45 VAND
no DOI — not checkedGetting from Joe to Gene (McCarthy): The Avoidance Canon, Legal Process Theory, and Narrowing Statutory Interpretation in the Warren Court, 93 CAL
no DOI — not checkedref153
no DOI — not checkedLaw as Equilibrium, 108 HARV
no DOI — not checkedref155
no DOI — not checkedCir. 1969); see also Hutchings v
no DOI — not checkedref157
no DOI — not checkedref158
no DOI — not checkedref159
no DOI — not checkedref160
no DOI — not checkedref161
no DOI — not checkedDuring debates over the 1972 amendments to Title VII, the latent congressional preference was made more explicit
no DOI — not checkedref163
no DOI — not checkedref164
no DOI — not checkedref165
no DOI — not checkedref166
no DOI — not checkedref167
no DOI — not checkedref169
no DOI — not checkedref170
no DOI — not checkedref171
no DOI — not checkedref172
no DOI — not checkedref174
no DOI — not checkedref175
no DOI — not checkedref176
no DOI — not checkedThe Iqbal Effect: The Impact of New Pleading Standards in Employment and Housing Discrimination Litigation, 100 KY
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2220505"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2220505/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2220505)