Reference health
Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Interconnector Investment: A Critical Appraisal
1 of 34 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
52 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1787/9789264255388-6-en
The 33 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1109/pes.2006.1709178
The California ISO transmission economic assessment methodology (TEAM): principles and application to Path 26
resolves10.1002/9780470608555.ch7
Using Market Simulations for Economic Assessment of Transmission Upgrades: Application of the California ISO Approach
resolves10.2307/2601042
The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry
resolves10.20417/nzjecol.42.3
Evaluation of remote cameras for monitoring multiple invasive mammals in New Zealand
resolves10.1016/j.tej.2006.04.004
Alleged Transmission Inadequacy: Is Restructuring the Cure or the Cause?
resolves10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.013
Unusual synthesis of carbohydrate sec–sec ether-linked pseudodisaccharides
resolves10.1016/j.tej.2006.11.004
Toward More Comprehensive Assessments of FERC Electricity Restructuring Policies: A Review of Recent Benefit-Cost Studies of RTOs
resolves10.1257/aer.97.4.1250
Do Markets Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on US Electric Generation Efficiency
resolves10.1257/jep.11.3.119
Restructuring, Competition and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electricity Sector
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.021
A real option analysis of investments in hydropower—The case of Norway
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.020
Cross-border transmission capacity allocation mechanisms in South East Europe
resolves10.1016/j.tej.2008.12.006
Does More International Transmission Capacity Increase Competition in the Belgian Electricity Market?
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.020
Welfare and competition effects of electricity interconnection between Ireland and Great Britain
resolves10.1111/1467-6451.00049
The Restructuring and Privatisation of Britain's CEGB—Was It Worth It?
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.004
Divorce comes at a price: An ex ante welfare analysis of ownership unbundling of the distribution and commercial companies in the Dutch energy sector
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.016
Simulation of the long-term dynamic of a market-based transmission interconnection
resolves10.1007/s11149-006-9003-y
Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2009.01.015
Do generation firms in restructured electricity markets have incentives to support social-welfare-improving transmission investments?
resolves10.4337/9781847204356.00014
Problems of Transmission Investment in a Deregulated Power Market
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2009.03.004
Transmission-constrained oligopoly in the Japanese electricity market
The 52 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedCompetition Innovation and Productivity Growth A Review of Theory and Evidence
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedPrinciples on Regulatory Control and Financial Reward for Infrastructure. Comments by ETSO -30
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedRegulation on Cross-Border Exchange as of
no DOI — not checkedconcerning measures to safeguard security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment EC
no DOI — not checkedPriority Interconnection Plan
no DOI — not checkedGuide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects. Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund and Instrument for Pre-Accession
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedThe Commission proposes ?5 billion new investment in energy and Internet broadband infrastructure in 2009-2010
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedPrivatized transport infrastructure and incentives to invest
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedSecurity of supply in electricity markets. Evidence and Policy issues
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedTransmission Constraints and Imperfect Markets for Power
no DOI — not checkedX-inefficiency Xists: A Reply to an Xorcist
no DOI — not checkedAllocative Efficiency vs
no DOI — not checkedBeyond regulation. ESNIE Cargese, Corsica. 16 May. Presentation London Economics (2007) Structure and Performance of Six European Wholesale Electricity Markets in 2003
no DOI — not checkedValuing Risk, supplement to the OEI guidelines 'supplement to Eijgenraam et al
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedLessons for the Appraisal of Interconnection Investments from the NorNed-Case
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedReport from the Nordic competition authorities. Capacity for Competition. Investing for an Efficient Nordic Electricity Market
no DOI — not checkedSharing the costs of transmission expansion: a cooperative game theory approach applied on the Nordic electricity market
no DOI — not checkedOptimizing Transmission from Distant Wind Farms
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedShort to medium term interconnector issues in the SEM
no DOI — not checkedReport prepared by CRA international for Transpower NZ ltD
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedref80
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedref83
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2226254"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2226254/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2226254)