Reference health
Non-Parametric Spectral Tests for Forecast Accuracy
1 of 24 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/1392185
The 23 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00071-9
Tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing for nested models
resolves10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.04.001
Advances in forecasting with neural networks? Empirical evidence from the NN3 competition on time series prediction
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.06.019
Generalized spectral tests for the martingale difference hypothesis
resolves10.1080/01621459.1999.10473874
Hypothesis Testing in Time Series via the Empirical Characteristic Function: A Generalized Spectral Density Approach
resolves10.1137/s1052623499363220
The Sample Average Approximation Method for Stochastic Discrete Optimization
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.10.001
Simulation based selection of competing structural econometric models
resolves10.2307/2328144
Was it Real? The Exchange Rate-Interest Differential Relation Over the Modern Floating-Rate Period
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedProbability and Measures
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedReal Analysis and Probability
no DOI — not checkedTesting serial independence via the empirical characteristic function
no DOI — not checkedLimit theorems for weakly dependent Hilbert space valued random variables with application to the stationary bootstrap
no DOI — not checkedParameter estimation of ARMA models with GARCH/APARCH errors: An R and SPlus software implementation
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2257234"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2257234/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2257234)