Reference health

Trust Them or Not? A Study on Media Credibility of Newspapers Accounts on Sina Weibo

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2258551
CiteStamped reference-health badge
13/13 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-10

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 13 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/107769904802500131
Contents of <i>Nieman Reports</i> for April
resolves10.1177/107769900308000202
Media Credibility Reconsidered: Synergy Effects between On-Air and Online News
resolves10.1177/1461444806069649
Online news meets established journalism: how China’s journalists evaluate the credibility of news websites
resolves10.1177/107769909807500208
Cruising is Believing?: Comparing Internet and Traditional Sources on Media Credibility Measures
resolves10.1177/107769900408100310
Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users
resolves10.1177/1748048509102182
A Shift in Media Credibility
resolves10.1177/107769908806500301
Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index
resolves10.1177/107769908806500102
The Roper Question and Television vs. Newspapers as Sources of News
resolves10.1111/an.1969.10.2.8
SHORT‐LIVED PHENOMENA CENTER
resolves10.1177/0267323100015001002
Media Credibility — Experience or Image?
resolves10.1080/15205430903225571
Credibility in Context: How Uncivil Online Commentary Affects News Credibility
resolves10.1177/1464884905051009
The political j-blogger
resolves10.1177/107769909407100115
Validating a Scale for the Measurement of Credibility: A Covariance Structure Modeling Approach
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedChanges and Constancy of Media in China within 30 Years
no DOI — not checkedOn the Credit of Mainland China's Mass Media: A Positive Research
no DOI — not checkedSelective Credibility: Study on the Comparison between Newspaper Credibility and Television Credibility of 1992 and
no DOI — not checkedMinneapolis: The American Society of Newspaper Editors
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedThe State of the News Media
no DOI — not checkedThe State of the News Media
no DOI — not checkedInvestigation of Chinese Media Credibility
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2258551"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2258551/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2258551/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2258551)