Reference health
Contingency Misfit and Organizational Trust Buffers
9 of 57 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411
does not resolve to a known work10.1177/009207038801600107
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1988.4306963
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0021-9010.84.3.445
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/1252308
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1998.533225
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1989.4279078
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1999.1580443
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.2001.4845794
The 48 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/orsc.13.3.274.2778
Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure?
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2000.tb00329.x
MULTIPLE RATERS IN SURVEY‐BASED OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND TUTORIAL
resolves10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200005)21:5<563::aid-smj99>3.0.co;2-0
The trusted general manager and business unit performance: empirical evidence of a competitive advantage
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00444.x
STRATEGY AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT TO REGAIN FIT AND PERFORMANCE: IN DEFENCE OF CONTINGENCY THEORY
resolves10.1177/002224299706100203
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer–Seller Relationships
resolves10.2307/256810
FIT, EQUIFINALITY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: A TEST OF TWO CONFIGURATIONAL THEORIES.
resolves10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-t
Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory
resolves10.1177/002224299405800201
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
resolves10.2307/2666959
Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00997.x
Revitalizing Entrepreneurship: The Search for New Research Opportunities
resolves10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.006
Using replication research for just‐in‐time purchasing construct development
resolves10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.002
A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain
resolves10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
TRUST AND DISTRUST IN ORGANIZATIONS: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions
resolves10.1016/j.jom.2005.01.002
Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices
resolves10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00049-7
A multiple‐method study of environmental uncertainty and manufacturing flexibility
resolves10.1007/s11187-009-9250-2
What happens to gazelles? The importance of dynamic management strategy
resolves10.1287/orsc.1100.0581
Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490285
Implementing Global Strategy: Characteristics of Global Subsidiary Mandates
resolves10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.02.002
Offshoring strategy: Motives, functions, locations, and governance modes of small, medium-sized and large firms
resolves10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1601
Development of Measures to Assess the Extent to Which an Information Technology Application Provides Competitive Advantage
resolves10.2307/2393808
Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness
resolves10.1287/mnsc.35.8.942
Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement
resolves10.1287/orsc.9.2.141
Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance
resolves10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200004)21:4<429::aid-smj81>3.3.co;2-r
Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00940.x
HOW ORGANIC IS YOUR ORGANIZATION?– DETERMINANTS OF ORGANIC/MECHANISTIC TENDENCIES IN A PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedReview of Howard Aldrich
no DOI — not checkedThe concept of fit in contingency theory
no DOI — not checkedTransaction cost economics meets posnerian law and economics
no DOI — not checkedSERVQUAL: a multi-item scale for measuring customer perception of service quality
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2261930"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2261930/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2261930)