Reference health
On the Validity of the Regression Discontinuity Design for Estimating Electoral Effects: New Evidence from over 40,000 Close Races
41/41 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1858711
Divided Government Versus Incumbency Externality Effect: Quasi-Experimental Evidence on Multiple Voting Decisions
resolves10.1257/pol.3.3.1
After Midnight: A Regression Discontinuity Design in Length of Postpartum Hospital Stays
resolves10.1198/016214508000000841
Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects
resolves10.1093/qje/qjr042
Saving Babies? Revisiting the effect of very low birth weight classification
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00532.x
Controlling the Airwaves: Incumbency Advantage and Community Radio in Brazil
resolves10.1093/pan/mpp013
Do Congressional Candidates Have Reverse Coattails? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design
resolves10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.010
A regression discontinuity design analysis of the incumbency advantage and tenure in the U.S. House
resolves10.1093/pan/mpr032
Elections and the Regression Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942–2008
resolves10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.215
The Value of School Facility Investments: Evidence from a Dynamic Regression Discontinuity Design<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1162/0033553042476189
Economic Impacts of New Unionization on Private Sector Employers: 1984-2001
resolves10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.399
Do Political Parties Matter? Evidence from U.S. Cities<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1093/restud/rdr046
Gender Interactions within Hierarchies: Evidence from the Political Arena
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00499.x
When Mayors Matter: Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00183
Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design
resolves10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.006
Incumbency as a source of spillover effects in mixed electoral systems: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design
resolves10.1017/s1049096508081213
Forecasting the 2008 U.S. House, Senate and Presidential Elections at the District and State Level
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.004
Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections
resolves10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085655
E<scp>LECTORAL</scp>F<scp>RAUD</scp>: Causes, Types, and Consequences
resolves10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.06.003
Estimating the impact of gubernatorial partisanship on policy settings and economic outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005
Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01048.x
Adjusting Treatment Effect Estimates by Post-Stratification in Randomized Experiments
resolves10.1162/jeea.2008.6.5.1037
Do Parties Matter for Economic Outcomes? A Regression-Discontinuity Approach
resolves10.2307/2529685
The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies
resolves10.1080/01621459.1979.10482513
Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies
resolves10.1002/sim.3565
Should observational studies be designed to allow lack of balance in covariate distributions across treatment groups?
resolves10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.008
Is regression adjustment supported by the Neyman model for causal inference?
resolves10.1037/h0044319
Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment.
resolves10.1007/s11127-008-9336-4
The disadvantaged incumbents: estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0343.2009.00358.x
ESTIMATING INCUMBENCY EFFECTS IN U.S. STATE LEGISLATURES: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedEntrenched Incumbents, Irresponsible Parties? Comparative Analysis of Incumbency Advantage across Different Electoral Systems
no DOI — not checkedElite Perceptions of Electoral Closeness: Fear in the Face of Uncertainty or Overconfidence of True Believers
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref55
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2265625"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2265625/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2265625)