Reference health

Do Retroactive Rebates Imply Lower Prices for Consumers?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2276396
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 27 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

23 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1787/clp-v5-art8-en
The 26 checked references that resolve
resolves10.15375/zwer-2009-0108
The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC and the Commission Guidance Paper on Exclusionary Conduct
resolves10.1093/jeclap/lpq021
When the Chips are Down: Some Reflections on the European Commission's Intel Decision
resolves10.5235/ecj.v5n2.409
Methodological Issues of the “More Economic Approach” to Unilateral Exclusionary Conduct. Proposal of Analysis Starting from the Treatment of Retroactive Rebates
resolves10.1257/aer.103.6.2384
Competition with Exclusive Contracts and Market-Share Discounts
resolves10.1177/0003603x0905400202
Loyalty/Requirement Rebates and the Antitrust Modernization Commission: What is the Appropriate Liability Standard?
resolves10.4337/9780857938091.00013
Tying, Bundling, and Loyalty/Requirement Rebates
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhn035
HOW LOYALTY DISCOUNTS CAN PERVERSELY DISCOURAGE DISCOUNTING
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2125398
Robust Exclusion through Loyalty Discounts with Buyer Commitment
resolves10.1016/b0-12-369400-0/00401-4
Appendix 1.16: European Union and Its European Commission*
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhn004
THE ANTITRUST ASSESSMENT OF LOYALTY DISCOUNTS AND REBATES
resolves10.1007/s11151-010-9266-4
All-Unit Discounts and the Problem of Surplus Division
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1315292
A Proposed Test for Separating Pro-Competitive Conditional Rebates from Anti-Competitive Ones
resolves10.1093/jeclap/lpp016
The Decision of the Commission of 13 May 2009 in the Intel case: Where is the Foreclosure and Consumer Harm?
resolves10.1177/0003603x0505000304
Distinguishing Competitive and Exclusionary Uses of Loyalty Discounts
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.11.001
An antitrust analysis of bundled loyalty discounts
resolves10.2139/ssrn.785966
Discounts and Exclusions
resolves10.2307/2555540
The Competitiveness of Markets with Switching Costs
resolves10.2307/2098494
The Dampening-of-Competition Effect of Exclusive Dealing
resolves10.2139/ssrn.666722
Switching Costs in Retroactive Rebates - What's Time Got to Do with it?
resolves10.5235/ecj.v2n1s.85
Article 82 Rebates: Four Common Fallacies
resolves10.4337/9781786430748.00022
QUANTIFICATION OF ANTITRUST DAMAGES
resolves10.2307/2555674
Monopoly with Incomplete Information
resolves10.1177/0003603x0505000302
Exclusionary Bundling
resolves10.5040/9781472559838.ch-013
Over-Regulating Lower Prices – Time for a Rethink on Pricing Abuses under Article 82 EC
resolves10.1093/jeclap/lpq070
Article 102 TFEU: Exclusive Dealing and Rebates
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhi001
Michelin II: A Per Se Rule Against Rebates by Dominant Companies?
The 23 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAn experimental investigation of Article 82 rebate schemes
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedCan bundled discounting increase consumer prices without excluding rivals?
no DOI — not checkedThe elusive antitrust standard on bundling in Europe and in the United States in the aftermath of the Microsoft cases
no DOI — not checkedTying, bundled discounts, and the death of the single monopoly profit theory
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedGuidance on the Commission's enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings
no DOI — not checkedRebates Revisited: Anti-Competitive Effects and Exclusionary Abuse Under Article 82
no DOI — not checkedRebates under Article 82 EU: Navigating uncertain waters
no DOI — not checkedThe economics of loyalty discounts and antitrust law in the United States
no DOI — not checkedEvaluating bundled discounts
no DOI — not checkedShould predatory pricing rules immunize exclusionary discounts?
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedProkent/Tomra, a textbook case? Abuse of dominance under perfect information
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedAssessment of conduct. Draft competition law guideline for consultation. OFT 414a
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedDefining legitimate competition: How to clarify pricing abuses under Article 82 EC
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref50
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2276396"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2276396/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2276396/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2276396)