Reference health
Weak and Unclear? A Survey of the Theory of Privatisation
40/40 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-21
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
31 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 40 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/jep.25.2.181
Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm: What Have We Learned over the Past 25 Years?
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00119
Incomplete Contracts and Public Ownership: Remarks, and an Application to Public‐Private Partnerships
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.009
Public versus private ownership: Quantity contracts and the allocation of investment tasks
resolves10.1177/0143831x99201002
Privatization in the European Union: A Critical Assessment of its Development, Rationale and Consequences
resolves10.7551/mitpress/2623.003.0021
Privatization, Ownership Redistribution, and Formation of the Institutional Basis for Economic Reforms
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023354
The Costs and Benefits of Privatization: An Incomplete Contracts Approach
The 31 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedPrivatization and Regulation in Chile
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedThe Thatcher Government's Economic Policy
no DOI — not checkedForum on Privatisation
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedPrivatization in France: 1983-1993'
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedEconomic Reform in New Zealand 198495: The Pursuit of Efficiency
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedPrivatisation and Regulation: A Review of the Issues
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedTime to Rethink Privatization in Transition Economies?', Discussion Paper Number 38
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedPrivatisation in Developing Countries: A Review of The Evidence and the Policy Lessons
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedA Survey of the Liberalisation of Public Enterprises in the UK since 1979
no DOI — not checkedEconomic Aspects of Privatization in Britain
no DOI — not checkedEconomic Rationales for Privatization in Industrial and Developing Countries
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref65
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedDoes Ownership Matter?
no DOI — not checkedref71
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-21 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2288974"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2288974/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2288974)