Reference health
School Quality, School Choice and Residential Mobility
98/98 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
19 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 98 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3386/w15549
Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston's Charters and Pilots
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00141-4
School choice through relocation: evidence from the Washington, D.C. area
resolves10.1257/aer.101.7.3019
School Desegregation, School Choice, and Changes in Residential Location Patterns by Race
resolves10.1111/j.0022-4146.2006.00434.x
Determinants of Residential Location Choice: How Important Are Local Public Goods in Attracting Homeowners to Central City Locations?*
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00164-5
Does immigration induce ‘native flight’ from public schools into private schools?
resolves10.3102/0162373709340917
Can Interdistrict Choice Boost Student Achievement? The Case of Connecticut’s Interdistrict Magnet School Program
resolves10.1162/edfp.2006.1.1.50
The Impacts of Charter Schools on Student Achievement: Evidence from North Carolina
resolves10.1002/pam.20226
School choice, racial segregation, and test‐score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina's charter school program*
resolves10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.10.001
Public school choice and integration evidence from Durham, North Carolina
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00081-5
Property tax limits, local fiscal behavior, and property values: evidence from Massachusetts under Proposition
resolves10.1006/jhec.1996.0018
School Quality and Real House Prices: Inter- and Intrametropolitan Effects
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.04.002
Mobility, housing markets, and schools: Estimating the effects of inter-district choice programs
resolves10.1016/s0094-1190(03)00063-9
Homeowners, property values, and the political economy of the school voucher
resolves10.1006/juec.2001.2232
Capitalization and the Voucher: An Analysis of Precinct Returns from California's Proposition 174
resolves10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.215
The Value of School Facility Investments: Evidence from a Dynamic Regression Discontinuity Design<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2126663
Housing Markets and Residential Segregation: Impacts of the Michigan School Finance Reform on Inter- and Intra-District Sorting
resolves10.17310/ntj.2014.1.02
RANKING UP BY MOVING OUT: THE EFFECT OF THE TEXAS TOP 10% PLAN ON PROPERTY VALUES
resolves10.3386/w7888
The Impact of School Choice on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Chicago Public Schools
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00702.x
The Effect of School Choice on Participants: Evidence from Randomized Lotteries
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.08.012
Jockeying for position: Strategic high school choice under Texas' top ten percent plan
resolves10.1016/j.jue.2011.08.003
School district quality and property values: Examining differences along school district boundaries
resolves10.1257/app.3.3.158
Are High-Quality Schools Enough to Increase Achievement Among the Poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children's Zone
resolves10.1257/mic.2.4.195
Identification and Semiparametric Estimation of Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdictions
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226355344.003.0008
Neighborhood Schools, Choice, and the Distribution of Educational Benefits
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(02)00187-1
Competition between private and public schools: testing stratification and pricing predictions
resolves10.1162/003465302317331892
Is There “White Flight” into Private Schools? Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Survey
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.10.009
When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.07.005
State fiscal institutions and empty-nest migration: Are Tiebout voters hobbled?
resolves10.1257/aer.97.3.789
Estimating the Effects of Private School Vouchers in Multidistrict Economies
resolves10.1257/pol.1.1.147
An Empirical Framework for Large-Scale Policy Analysis, with an Application to School Finance Reform in Michigan
resolves10.1080/00420988120080641
A Conditional Logit Model of the Role of Local Public Services in Residential Choice
resolves10.2307/1058048
Changes in City and Suburban House Prices during a Period of Expected School Desegregation
resolves10.1086/261073
Micro Estimates of Public Spending Demand Functions and Tests of the Tiebout and Median-Voter Hypotheses
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.09.014
Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice
resolves10.3386/w15915
Household Location and Schools in Metropolitan Areas with Heterogeneous Suburbs; Tiebout, Alonso, and Government Policy
resolves10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1373
Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1353/urb.2004.0007
School Funding Equalization and Residential Location for the Young and the Elderly
resolves10.1162/rest_a_00077
Achievement and Behavior in Charter Schools: Drawing a More Complete Picture
resolves10.1016/0272-7757(81)90029-7
Real estate values, school quality, and the pattern of urban development in Charlotte, North Carolina
resolves10.3102/0002831214541046
Does School Policy Affect Housing Choices? Evidence From the End of Desegregation in Charlotte–Mecklenburg
resolves10.1111/1097-3923.00002
School Finance Induced Migration and Stratification Patterns: The Impact of Private School Vouchers
resolves10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00041-X
School finance, spatial income segregation, and the nature of communities
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226355344.003.0006
Introducing School Choice into Multidistrict Public School System
resolves10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02022-8
Chapter 22 Income and Peer Quality Sorting in Public and Private Schools
resolves10.1016/S0166-0462(97)00013-6
Community choice and local public services: A discrete choice approach
resolves10.1086/259584
The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis
resolves10.1016/j.jue.2004.10.005
House prices and the provision of local public services: capitalization under school choice programs
resolves10.1016/0094-1190(79)90027-5
Residential choice and the local public sector: An alternative test of the “Tiebout Hypothesis”
resolves10.1162/rest_a_00038
School Quality and Residential Property Values: Evidence from Vancouver Rezoning
resolves10.1257/000282803322655482
Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990
resolves10.1016/s1574-0080(99)80016-9
Chapter 47 Sorting and voting: A review of the literature on urban public finance
resolves10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.181
Private Choices, Public Consequences: Magnet School Choice and Segregation by Race and Poverty
resolves10.1016/0094-1190(80)90029-7
Gross rents and market values: Testing the implications of Tiebout's hypothesis
resolves10.1080/10835547.1990.12090619
Magnet Schools and the Differential Impact of School Quality on Residential Property Values
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1716988
The Impact of School Racial Compositions on Neighborhood Racial Compositions: Evidence from School Redistricting
resolves10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.11.003
Do student migrations affect school performance? Evidence from Wisconsin's inter-district public school program
resolves10.1002/pam.21691
School Vouchers and Student Outcomes: Experimental Evidence from
<scp>W</scp>
ashington,
<scp>DC</scp>
The 19 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedSchool desegregation and urban change: Evidence from city boundaries
no DOI — not checkedCalifornia's school finance reform: An experiment in fiscal federalism
no DOI — not checkedCompetition between private and public schools, vouchers, and peer-group effects
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedThe Tiebout hypothesis and residential income segregation
no DOI — not checkedPrivate schools and residential choices: Accessibility, mobility, and welfare
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedUse of school choice
no DOI — not checkedref86
no DOI — not checkedEducation-finance reform and the distribution of education resources
no DOI — not checkedAlternative education finance strategies
no DOI — not checkedTiebout Sorting and Competition
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedThe Many Faces of Tiebout
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2304850"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2304850/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2304850)