Reference health

International Humanitarian Law Transparency

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2321703
CiteStamped reference-health badge
9/9 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-29

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

73 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 9 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02224.x
A Great and Revolutionary Law? The First Four Years of India’s Right to Information Act
resolves10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim210030051
War in a Distant Country, Afghanistan: Invasion and Resistance
resolves10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim140160351
Was General Clay a Revisionist? Strategic Aspects of the United States Occupation of Germany
resolves10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9970-0050
aclu-asks-justice-department-to-appoint-independent-prosecutor-to-investigate-torture-mar-18-2009-6pp
resolves10.2307/1065089
Insurance. Truthfulness of Representation That Insured Had Not Been under Care of a Physician, When Insured Had Consulted Physicians
resolves10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-3098-0070
afghan-network-calls-for-investigation-of-journalists-death-sept-11-2009
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1877268
Significant Numbers: Civilian Casualties and Strategic Peacebuilding
resolves10.1017/s1816383107000938
A Guide to the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977
resolves10.1017/s181638311200046x
31st International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, Geneva, 28 November – 1 December 2011
The 73 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedBeyond the Flag of Dunant: Secrecy and the Compliance Mission of the International Committee of the Red Cross
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedSuch a stance has proven confidential, as when it was later learned that the ICRC chose not to speak out in 1942 of what it knew of the Holocaust
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedGenerating Support
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedEvidence shows that German troops received little training in NATO procedures, perhaps because they did not anticipate the frequent need to engage in the use of force. Matthias Gebauer, Aftermath of a Deadly Airstrike: Misguided Esprit de Corps Lets Officer Off the Hook
no DOI — not checkedAs late as 2010, German newspapers reported that German troops refused to take part in such missions in Afghanistan 42 The tankers were stuck for several hours on a sandbank in the Kunduz River. Matthias Gebauer, Inquiry into Kunduz Bombing: German Defense Minister Blasted for Slanderous Statements
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedHe also acted without advice from his legal advisor or supervisors,The End of Innocence in Afghanistan: The German Air Strike Has Changed Everything
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedDeadly Bombing in Kunduz: German Army Withheld Information from US Pilots
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedThe criminal case began as a local prosecution but was moved to "germany's highest prosecution office to ascertain if international law covered the incident
no DOI — not checkedThe criminal case began as a local prosecution but was moved to "germany's highest prosecution office to ascertain if international law covered the incident
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedMinister: German Army Made Mistakes in Afghan Strike
no DOI — not checkedGerman Foreign Minister Defends Targeted Killings in Afghanistan
no DOI — not checkedAftermath of a Deadly Airstrike: Misguided Esprit de Corps Lets Officer Off the Hook
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedCompensation for Bombing Victims: The Price of an Afghan Life
no DOI — not checkedOnly for service use", marked only for German viewing
no DOI — not checkedCompensation for Bombing Victims: The Price of an Afghan Life
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedPublished by WikiLeaks 87 The leaks to traditional media outlets tended to be more filtered in the information provided to the public. For instance, the newspaper Der Spiegel received access to a secret NATO report, but did not publish it in its entirety. The newspaper did reveal several of NATO's factual determinations such as: Klein's reliance on a single intelligence source, Klein's failure to identify the applicable Rules of Engagement, the American pilots' repeated efforts to delay or avoid the strike, and Klein's statement to the pilots that the people on the ground were an imminent threat 87 and that enemy contact had been made
no DOI — not checkedOne Year After the Kunduz Air Strike: No Sign of a Full Investigation
no DOI — not checkedThe committee functions as a quasi-judicial body with the authority to "question witnesses and experts and request that further investigations be carried out by courts and administrative authorities
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedThe World from Berlin: Truth is Often the First Casualty of War
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedSome evidence suggests they had a "spy
no DOI — not checkedInquiry into Kunduz Bombing: German Defense Minister Blasted for Slanderous Statements
no DOI — not checkedMerkel Gives Testimony on
no DOI — not checkedThe World from Berlin: German Soldiers Don't Believe in a Happy Outcome
no DOI — not checkedTestimony to Parliamentary Inquiry: German Officer Defends Controversial Afghanistan Air Strike
no DOI — not checkedOne Year After the Kunduz Air Strike, No Sign of a Full Investigation
no DOI — not checkedTestimony to Parliamentary Inquiry: German Officer Defends Controversial Afghanistan Air Strike
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checked) (report describing use of Australian Spy base to locate terrorist suspects and provide intelligence to Americans for drone strikes)
no DOI — not checked(reporting on dismissing lawsuit attempted to find out nature of UK involvement in drone strikes). Notably, Germans had provided information on the head of the Taliban group that abducted the tanks described below to place him on Joint Prioritized Effects List. This list is also known as a "capture or kill List"Capture or Kill: Germany Gave Names to Secret Taliban Hit List
no DOI — not checkedWikiLeaks Cache Reveals Pakistan's Role in Drone Strikes
no DOI — not checkedWhy Yemen claims role in US drone strike on cleric Anwar al-Awlaki
no DOI — not checkedJudicial Branch during the Long War: Drone Courts, Damage Suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests in APPLYING INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL BODIES
no DOI — not checkedFor such time as they participate. whereas if the state is not engaged in armed conflict, it must use other rules to decide when and against whom force is appropriate. 116 whereas they are often unlawful and subject to a different calculation under other bodies of law law
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedSummary or Arbitrary Executions Addendum 3. A/HRC/20/22/Add.3 13n 68 (citing the Geneva Conventions I-IV 1, 50, 51, 130, 147, API I 11
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedJudicial Branch during the Long War: Drone Courts, Damage Suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests in APPLYING INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL BODIES
no DOI — not checkedMany consider this requirement to be customary international law and thus apply to even non-ratifying states. ICRC, A guide to the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977, 88 INT'L REV
no DOI — not checkedSix states, including the United States, are known to have made the instruments setting up national review mechanisms available to the ICRC. ICRC, A guide to the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977
no DOI — not checkedref80
no DOI — not checkedref83
no DOI — not checkedref84
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2321703"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2321703/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2321703/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2321703)