Reference health

A Penny for Your Thoughts: A Survey of Methods for Eliciting Beliefs

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2353295
CiteStamped reference-health badge
5 of 84 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

22 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1007/bf01669774
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-295x.102.4.684
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2284229
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/bf01426214
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-295x.101.4.547
The 79 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.33.4.542
Notes—Discovering Personal Probabilities When Utility Functions are Unknown
resolves10.1007/s11166-014-9194-z
Estimating subjective probabilities
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00560.x
SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES IN GAMES: AN APPLICATION TO THE OVERBIDDING PUZZLE*
resolves10.1037/h0025061
Subjective probabilities inferred from estimates and bets.
resolves10.1037/h0027919
Subjective probability revision and subsequent decisions.
resolves10.1002/bs.3830090304
Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method
resolves10.1016/s1574-0722(07)00115-1
Chapter 115 On the Performance of the Lottery Procedure for Controlling Risk Preferences
resolves10.1007/s10683-010-9249-1
Belief elicitation in experiments: is there a hedging problem?
resolves10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:vofeit>2.0.co;2
VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2014.10.006
Beliefs and actions in the trust game: Creating instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect
resolves10.1016/s0167-2681(99)00078-5
Thinking like a game theorist: factors affecting the frequency of equilibrium play
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.35.1.1
Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation.
resolves10.1111/j.2044-8317.1965.tb00695.x
METHODS FOR DISCRIMINATING LEVELS OF PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE CONCERNING A TEST ITEM
resolves10.1016/0001-6918(70)90012-0
Logical foundations and measurement of subjective probability
resolves10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.008
Measuring subjective expectations in developing countries: A critical review and new evidence
resolves10.1016/0030-5073(73)90007-x
Intrasubject comparison of four response modes for “subjective probability” assessment
resolves10.1006/obhd.1993.1025
The Negative Effect of Probability Assessments on Decision Quality
resolves10.1016/0030-5073(82)90250-1
Scoring-rule feedback and the overconfidence syndrome in subjective probability forecasting
resolves10.1080/13504850903559575
What do prediction markets predict?
resolves10.1287/mnsc.29.4.447
Effective Scoring Rules for Probabilistic Forecasts
resolves10.1007/s10683-010-9246-4
The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments
resolves10.1198/016214505000000105
Statistical Methods for Eliciting Probability Distributions
resolves10.1198/016214506000001437
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
resolves10.1111/j.2517-6161.1952.tb00104.x
Rational Decisions
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2003.03.003
Trust responsiveness and beliefs
resolves10.1007/s11166-011-9133-1
Belief elicitation in the presence of naïve respondents: An experimental study
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2014.02.011
Eliciting subjective probabilities with binary lotteries
resolves10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00512.x
Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games
resolves10.1093/restud/rdt006
The Binarized Scoring Rule
resolves10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00170-6
Do players correctly estimate what others do?
resolves10.1007/s11166-005-6565-5
An Experimental Comparison of Induced and Elicited Beliefs
resolves10.1023/A:1007706009628
Elicitation of Subjective Probabilities when the Initial Endowment is Unobservable
resolves10.1016/0030-5073(73)90054-8
Psychological effects of proper scoring rules
resolves10.1287/opre.1080.0665
Evaluating Quantile Assessments
resolves10.1080/01621459.1988.10478605
Separating Probability Elicitation from Utilities
resolves10.1007/bf01362238
The impossibility of experimental elicitation of subjective probabilities
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2012.02.017
Information aggregation and belief elicitation in experimental parimutuel betting markets
resolves10.1002/mcda.454
Comonotonic proper scoring rules to measure ambiguity and subjective beliefs
resolves10.1145/1486877.1486886
Eliciting properties of probability distributions
resolves10.2307/2345078
On the Reconciliation of Probability Assessments
resolves10.1177/0272989x0102100105
General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples
resolves10.2307/2951565
A More Robust Definition of Subjective Probability
resolves10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00222-7
Identification of decision rules in experiments on simple games of proposal and response
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00537.x
Measuring Expectations
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2006.01.004
Interpreting the predictions of prediction markets
resolves10.1287/mnsc.22.10.1087
Scoring Rules for Continuous Probability Distributions
resolves10.1073/pnas.42.9.654
MEASURES OF THE VALUE OF INFORMATION
resolves10.2307/2938318
Public and Private Information: An Experimental Study of Information Pooling
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1050.0379
Eliciting Informative Feedback: The Peer-Prediction Method
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00316
An Experimental Study of Belief Learning Using Elicited Beliefs
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2353500
Lossed in Translation: An Off-the-Shelf Method to Recover Probabilistic Beliefs from Loss-Averse Agents
resolves10.2307/2235360
Value Orientations, Expectations and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods
resolves10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00557.x
A Truth Serum for Non-Bayesians: Correcting Proper Scoring Rules for Risk Attitudes
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2009.03.025
On eliciting beliefs in strategic games
resolves10.1037/h0023653
Conservatism in a simple probability inference task.
resolves10.1126/science.1102081
A Bayesian Truth Serum for Subjective Data
resolves10.1006/obhd.1998.2807
Effects of a Relative-Frequency Elicitation Question on Likelihood Judgment Accuracy: The Case of External Correspondence
resolves10.21236/ad0600441
BELIEF STATES: A PRELIMINARY EMPIRICAL STUDY
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2009.04.001
Stated beliefs versus inferred beliefs: A methodological inquiry and experimental test
resolves10.1214/aos/1176347398
A General Method for Comparing Probability Assessors
resolves10.4236/tel.2013.31006
Eliciting Probabilities, Means, Medians, Variances and Covariances without Assuming Risk Neutrality
resolves10.2307/1911378
An Experimental Study of Expectation Formation
resolves10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040927
Belief Elicitation in the Laboratory
resolves10.1016/0030-5073(67)90012-8
Subjective probability revisions under several cost-payoff arrangements
resolves10.1037/e457312004-001
Relative variance preferences in a choice-among-bets paradigm.
resolves10.1007/bf02289503
Admissible Probability Measurement Procedures
resolves10.1007/s10683-012-9345-5
Estimating the causal effect of beliefs on contributions in repeated public good games
resolves10.1111/j.2517-6161.1961.tb00388.x
Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision
resolves10.1016/0001-6918(70)90013-2
Measurement of subjective probability
resolves10.4992/jjpsy.22.29
MEASUREMEIT OF INTUITIVE-PROBABILITY BY A METHOD OF GAME
resolves10.1111/ecoj.12160
Belief Elicitation: A Horse Race among Truth Serums
resolves10.1111/j.2044-8317.1973.tb00503.x
THE FAIR BETTING GAME AS AN ADMISSIBLE PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES
resolves10.1016/0030-5073(73)90065-2
Coherence of human judgment in a limited probabilistic environment
resolves10.1109/3477.979958
A method for evaluating elicitation schemes for probabilistic models
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.045
Incentive effects: The case of belief elicitation from individuals in groups
resolves10.1002/bdm.3960060406
An evaluation of the reliability of probability judgments across response modes and over time
resolves10.3386/w12200
Interpreting Prediction Market Prices as Probabilities
resolves10.1037/0096-3445.124.4.424
Graininess of judgment under uncertainty: An accuracy-informativeness trade-off.
resolves10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z
Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments
The 22 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedProper Scoring Rules for Fractiles
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedExpected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedTruth and Probability
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedMoney does not induce risk neutral behavior, but binary lotteries do even worse
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedMeasurement of Subjective Probability Distribution
no DOI — not checkedref100
no DOI — not checkedScoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities
no DOI — not checkedref102
no DOI — not checked2) CE: certainty equivalent (Section 2.2.1) LgSR: log scoring rule (Section 2.2.1) LnSR: linear scoring rule (Section 2.6) PSR: proper scoring rule (Section 2.2) QSR: quadratic scoring rule
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2353295"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2353295/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2353295/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2353295)