Reference health
Multiple Testing in Economics
29/29 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
resolves10.1093/biomet/93.3.491
Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
resolves10.1086/522036
So Many Correlated Tests, So Little Time! Rapid Adjustment of P Values for Multiple Correlated Tests
resolves10.1002/gepi.20538
Meta‐analysis of genetic association studies and adjustment for multiple testing of correlated SNPs and traits
resolves10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00719.x
Controlling the Familywise Error Rate with Plug-in Estimator for the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses
resolves10.1111/j.1755-053x.2009.01026.x
Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors Are Reliably Important?
resolves10.1371/journal.pgen.1000456
Rapid and Accurate Multiple Testing Correction and Power Estimation for Millions of Correlated Markers
resolves10.2139/ssrn.885364
A Stepwise Spa Test for Data Snooping and its Application on Fund Performance Evaluation
resolves10.1093/bioinformatics/bti053
An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies
resolves10.2307/2531814
A Bayesian Approach to the Multiplicity Problem for Significance Testing with Binomial Data
resolves10.1214/009053605000000778
False discovery and false nondiscovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures
resolves10.1214/aos/1074290335
The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.00439.x
Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-9-79
Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies
resolves10.1111/j.1468-036x.2009.00520.x
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns: What Have We Learnt from the Past Twenty‐Five Years of Research?
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAdaptive false discovery rate control under independence and dependence
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedA simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedOn methods controlling the false discovery rate
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref35
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2358214"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2358214/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2358214)