Reference health
Can Online Word-of-Mouth Communication Reveal True Product Quality? Experimental Insights, Econometric Results, and Analytical Modeling
1 of 30 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-04
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/3203428
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01331.x
Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Finite Mixture Models
resolves10.1177/002224376700400308
Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product
resolves10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1580.20580
Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers
resolves10.1023/A:1024634613982
Measuring Prices and Price Competition Online: Amazon.com and BarnesandNoble.com
resolves10.1109/hicss.2006.534
When Online Reviews Meet Hyperdifferentiation: A Study of Craft Beer Industry
resolves10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms
resolves10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.001
Do online reviews matter? — An empirical investigation of panel data
resolves10.2307/1911522
Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses
resolves10.1287/isre.1050.0072
Internet Exchanges for Used Books: An Empirical Analysis of Product Cannibalization and Welfare Impact
resolves10.1086/208570
Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective
resolves10.1086/208925
An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information
resolves10.1080/01621459.1994.10476772
A Graphical Technique for Determining the Number of Components in a Mixture of Normals
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedOnline Reviews: Do Consumers Use Them?
no DOI — not checkedThe Impact of Online Recommendations and Consumer Feedback on Sales
no DOI — not checkedExploring the Value of Online Reviews to Organizations: Implications for Revenue Forecasting and Planning
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedThe One Number You Need to Grow
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-04 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2380731"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2380731/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2380731)