Reference health
What Determines Time Spent in Peer Reviews? Evidence from The Accounting Review
60/60 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
29 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 60 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1467-629x.2010.00378.x
An empirical examination of the editorial review processes of accounting journals
resolves10.1007/s11192-007-1823-8
Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting
resolves10.1016/0169-2070(95)00626-5
Publication of research on controversial topics: The early acceptance procedure
resolves10.1007/s11948-997-0017-3
Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.2006.00032.x
THE SLOWDOWN IN FIRST‐RESPONSE TIMES OF ECONOMICS JOURNALS: CAN IT BE BENEFICIAL?
resolves10.1016/j.jaccedu.2008.04.001
An examination of the peer review process in accounting journals
resolves10.1023/A:1005773522456
Ethics and the Accounting Publishing Process: Author, Reviewer, and Editor Issues
resolves10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.55
The Importance of Circulating and Presenting Manuscripts: Evidence from the Accounting Literature
resolves10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199604)47:4<302::aid-asi6>3.0.co;2-0
Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?
resolves10.1111/j.1467-629x.2012.00472.x
Publishing: art or science? Reflections from an editorial perspective
resolves10.2308/iace.2010.25.4.631
Accounting Program Research Rankings by Topical Area and Methodology
resolves10.1016/j.adiac.2008.08.009
An assessment of patterns of co-authorship for academic accountants within premier journals: Evidence from 1979–2004
resolves10.1007/s11573-013-0692-2
In search of rigor, relevance, and legitimacy: what drives the impact of publications?
resolves10.2308/iace-50127
Exploring Accounting Doctoral Program Decline: Variation and the Search for Antecedents
resolves10.1016/b978-008043972-3/50026-8
Requirements and Understandings for Publishing Academic Research: An Insider View
resolves10.1016/j.jaccedu.2006.04.002
Reasons accounting case/instructional resource papers are rejected for publication
resolves10.1111/j.0306-686x.2005.00624.x
International Publishing Patterns: An Investigation of Leading UK and US Accounting and Finance Journals
resolves10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1639
The Effect of Disclosures by Management, Analysts, and Business Press on Cost of Capital, Return Volatility, and Analyst Forecasts: A Study Using Content Analysis
resolves10.1086/261927
Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.027
A theory of self-selection in a market with matching frictions: An application to delay in refereeing times in economics journals
resolves10.1006/cpac.1998.0281
ACCOUNTING FROM THE INSIDE: LEGITIMIZING THE ACCOUNTING ACADEMIC ELITE
resolves10.1080/096392800413672
Relationship between publications in selected journals and Research Assessment Exercise rankings in 1996 for UK accountancy departments
resolves10.1017/s0140525x00011183
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
resolves10.1007/s11192-012-0779-5
Looking for the impact of peer review: does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact?
resolves10.1016/0748-5751(84)90004-6
Setting realistic expectations for publishing in leading accounting research journals
resolves10.1007/bf03342710
VHB-JOURQUAL2: Method, Results, and Implications of the German Academic Association for Business Research’s Journal Ranking
resolves10.2308/iace.2006.21.2.81
Reasons Research Papers Are Rejected at Accounting Education Journals
resolves10.1506/rckm-13fm-gk0e-3w50
Publishing in the Majors: A Comparison of Accounting, Finance, Management, and Marketing*
resolves10.1506/car.24.4.9
Concentration in Publishing at Top‐Tier Business Journals: Evidence and Potential Explanations*
resolves10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.09.015
Conceptual Debates and Empirical Evidence About the Peer Review Process for Scholarly Journals
resolves10.1007/s11192-008-2164-y
Editorial delay of food research papers is influenced by authors’ experience but not by country of origin of the manuscripts
The 29 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedA critical review of the double-blind review -The second look
no DOI — not checkedThe Peer Review Process in Finance Journals
no DOI — not checkedA Message from the President
no DOI — not checkedThe Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors
no DOI — not checkedDisclosure Level and the Cost of Equity Capital
no DOI — not checkedEditorial and Publication Lag in the Accounting and Finance Literature
no DOI — not checkedFactors leading to the rejection of accountants' manuscripts
no DOI — not checkedPresident's Message
no DOI — not checkedReviewing and Being Reviewed: developing our paper with "anonymous coauthors
no DOI — not checkedThe Sustainability of Success: Distinguishing the Lucky from the Good in the Stacked Deck of Academic Accounting. The Accounting Educators
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedTurning a Presentation into an Article
no DOI — not checkedAccounting Academic Ethics: A Code Is Needed
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedSocial and Ethical Dimensions of the Repeated Journal Reviewer
no DOI — not checkedAre Publication Requirements for Accounting Faculty Promotions Still Increasing?
no DOI — not checkedPeer-Reviewed Journals and Quality
no DOI — not checkedThe Value of a
no DOI — not checkedSustaining the unsustainable? A critical review of the double-blind review
no DOI — not checkedCurrent Publication Lags in Economics Journals
no DOI — not checkedImproving a Manuscript's Readability and Likelihood of Publication
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2387395"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2387395/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2387395)