Reference health
Should Auditors Be Concerned About Pleasing the Client? An Examination of Auditor Changes Subsequent to Earnings Revisions
1 of 30 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2978933
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1506/car.26.2.3
Discussion of "Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan"*
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01144.x
Audit Market Concentration and Auditor Tolerance for Earnings Management
<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.03.002
Disciplinary measures in response to restatements after Sarbanes–Oxley
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01137.x
Does Company Reputation Matter for Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Restatements*
resolves10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.95
Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals following “New” Going-Concern Reports
resolves10.1506/car.26.2.2
Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan*
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x
Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC*
resolves10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.83
The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover
resolves10.2308/acch.2011.25.1.17
Auditor Realignments Accompanying Implementation of SOX 404 ICFR Reporting Requirements
resolves10.1111/1540-6261.00559
Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments
resolves10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2010.12.004
Audit firm industry specialization and the audit report lag
resolves10.1093/pan/mpr025
Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies
resolves10.2308/accr-50680
Determinants and Market Consequences of Auditor Dismissals after Accounting Restatements
resolves10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.779
Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation?
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679x.2009.00363.x
National and Office‐Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality
resolves10.2308/accr-51182
The Impact of Audit Completeness and Quality on Earnings Announcement GAAP Disclosures
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAudit structure and other determinants of audit report lag: An empirical analysis
no DOI — not checkedWhy good accountants do bad audits
no DOI — not checkedThe unintended consequences of PCAOB auditing standard Nos. 2 and 3 on the reliability of preliminary earnings releases
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedA review of archival auditing research
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedCosts associated with going-concern modified audit opinions: An analysis of auditor changes, subsequent opinions, and client failures
no DOI — not checkedTimeliness of annual earnings announcements: Some empirical evidence
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedAuditors' incentives and their application of financial accounting standards
no DOI — not checkedEbalance: A Stata package for entropy balancing
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedAn analysis of restatements due to errors and auditor changes by Fortune 500 companies
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedSummary of Comments Relating to Proposed Amendments to Accelerate Periodic Report Filing Dates and Disclosure Concerning Website Access to Reports. Release No. 33-8089
no DOI — not checkedProposed Rule: Acceleration of Periodic Report Filing Dates and Disclosure Concerning Website Access to Reports. Release No. 33-8089
no DOI — not checkedAuditor changes and restatements: An analysis of recent history
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2409281"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2409281/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2409281)