Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 74 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBut see Morris, supra note 59, at 361 (asking "whether in practice, a regime of universal jurisdiction will do more good or more harm overall
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedArticle III's alienage jurisdiction extends to "Controversies . . . between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects
no DOI — not checkedThe Door Is Still Ajar" For Human Rights Litigation
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checked); see also Chase, supra note 396, at 284 (observing that "the American dispute process . . . is exceptional even when measured against its siblings in the common law family"). 402. Brief of the Governments of the K. of the Netherlands and the U.K. of Great Britain and N. Ireland as Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party at 24, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedEnding Class Actions As We Know Them: Rethinking the American Class Action, 64 EMORY L
no DOI — not checkedRule": Assuring the Lion His Share
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedstatute frames the issue of U.S. courts' application of international law so starkly
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedTowards an International Judicial System, 56 STAN
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedHow to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law, 54 DUKE L
no DOI — not checkedOne may expect, for instance, an international version of the debate in American constitutional law over the legitimacy of the "passive virtues"-that is, doctrines by which courts avoid taking jurisdiction over disputes likely to damage their legitimacy
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checked74 (noting the Washington administration's insistence on neutral rights during the conflict between
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedB]ecause of the costly and time-consuming nature of international criminal justice, where national courts have failed to act, the ICC can only investigate or prosecute a small fraction of the perpetrators
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedJudiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom, 108 NW. U. L. REV. 543 (2014) (arguing that the British judiciary is likely to become more powerful generally vis-�-vis the government based on its acquisition of responsibility to enforce the rules of devolved power in the U.K.). 486
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedThe Legitimacy of International Human Rights Review: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedHopelessly Hollow History: Revisionist Devaluing of Brown v. Board of Education, 80 VA
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedref80
no DOI — not checkedThe Case for FDA Preemption
no DOI — not checkedref84
no DOI — not checkedThe Ordinary Diet of the Law": The Presumption Against Preemption in the Roberts Court
no DOI — not checked1854 (observing that the legislative process is "notoriously dominated by committees, strongwilled individuals, collective action problems, and private rent-seeking" and suggesting that Congress should more appropriately play a reactive role by incorporating norms of CIL in federal statutes after they have evolved through judicial recognition); see also Jonathan Serrie
no DOI — not checkedSee generally D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. FDIC, 315
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedfashioning a federal-common-law right of contribution in suits under � 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5). 529. Wuerth
no DOI — not checkedref92
no DOI — not checkedref93
no DOI — not checked534 Nor is the business community's "nightmare scenario" likely to come to pass: no large damages awards have been rendered against corporate defendants; settlements have been relatively modest; and massive class actions remain largely on the horizon. Likewise, the federal courts' efforts to narrow the ATS, including the Supreme Court's decision in Kiobel, are unlikely to usher in a new era of expanded impunity. The courts' limits have limits, and other avenues-including the TVPA and state litigationremain. It is, perhaps, time to step back and take a breath. 531. The U.S. Supreme Court Must Preserve the Alien Tort Statute for International Corporate Human Rights Cases
no DOI — not checkedref95
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.