Reference health

The Impacts of Elicitation Mechanism and Reward Size on Estimated Rates of Time Preference

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2410914
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 20 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-29

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1007/bf01673482
The 19 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00848.x
Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences
resolves10.1257/aer.102.7.3333
Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets
resolves10.1257/aer.102.7.3357
Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences
resolves10.1002/bs.3830090304
Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method
resolves10.1007/s10640-005-6028-0
Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis
resolves10.1016/s0167-4870(99)00042-2
Valuing future private and social benefits: The discounted utility model versus hyperbolic discounting models
resolves10.1257/jel.40.2.351
Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review
resolves10.1257/000282802762024674
Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment
resolves10.1287/mnsc.32.9.1123
Value Functions for Infinite-Period Planning
resolves10.1086/261737
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
resolves10.1023/A:1014067910173
Examining Predictive Accuracy Among Discounting Models
resolves10.1162/003355397555253
Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting
resolves10.1007/s11166-013-9163-y
Estimating discount factors for public and private goods and testing competing discounting hypotheses
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2003.06.004
Revealing consumers' willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction
resolves10.2307/2296547
On Second-Best National Saving and Game-Equilibrium Growth
resolves10.2307/2967612
A Note on Measurement of Utility
resolves10.1016/s0928-7655(00)00038-5
Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.018
Possession and discounting behavior
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x
COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedResolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2410914"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2410914/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2410914/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2410914)