Reference health
No Comment?! The Drivers of Reactions to Online Posts in Professional Groups
36/36 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
19 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1108/13673270310463626
Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599
Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.004
Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human–computer interaction
resolves10.1002/dir.20082
Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810
Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix
resolves10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms
resolves10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003
Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing
resolves10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities
resolves10.1287/isre.1120.0469
Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content
resolves10.2190/7mqv-x9uj-c7q3-nrag
Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing
resolves10.1002/dir.10073
Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?
resolves10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
resolves10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities
resolves10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00273.x
Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities
resolves10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007
Social Media Metrics — A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media
resolves10.1509/jmkg.73.5.90
Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site
resolves10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0068
Do you Want to Be my “friend”? MONETARY VALUE OF WORD-OF-MOUTH MARKETING IN ONLINE COMMUNITIES
resolves10.2307/25148667
Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice1
resolves10.1177/0170840607076003
Beyond the Call of Duty: Why Customers Contribute to Firm-hosted Commercial Online Communities
The 19 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedAn Exchange Theory Model of Interpersonal Communication
no DOI — not checkedFirm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Field-Based QuasiExperiment
no DOI — not checkedLogic and Conversation
no DOI — not checkedCan You Measure the ROI of Your Social Media Marketing?
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedHewlett-Packard Case Study: Creating 2,000+ Brand Advocates in Two Weeks with LinkedIn Recommendation Ads
no DOI — not checkedUsing Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities
no DOI — not checkedStrategies for Online Communities
no DOI — not checkedWeblogs, Genres and Individual Differences
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedThe One Number You Need to Grow
no DOI — not checkedEffects of Age and Gender on Blogging
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedOnline Discussion Groups as Social Networks: An Empirical Investigation of Word-of-Mouth on the Internet
no DOI — not checkedref54
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2465629"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2465629/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2465629)