Reference health

The Global Consumption and Income Project (GCIP): An Overview

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2480636
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 32 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.2307/jj.26193269
The 31 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1475-4991.1998.tb00299.x
THE SENSITIVITY OF INCOME INEQUALITY TO CHOICE OF EQUIVALENCE SCALES
resolves10.1257/jel.39.3.771
Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of “Secondary” Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study
resolves10.1093/cje/bel013
On data: a case study of the evolution of income inequality across time and across countries
resolves10.1257/jel.46.1.57
What Do We Know about Global Income Inequality?
resolves10.2307/2234982
Equivalence Scale Relativities Revisited
resolves10.1111/j.1475-4991.1988.tb00564.x
EQUIVALENCE SCALES, WELL‐BEING, INEQUALITY, AND POVERTY: SENSITIVITY ESTIMATES ACROSS TEN COUNTRIES USING THE LUXEMBOURG INCOME STUDY (LIS) DATABASE
resolves10.1093/wbro/lkh020
How Have the World's Poorest Fared since the Early 1980s?
resolves10.1016/0165-1765(93)90186-g
A comparison of alternative functional forms for the Lorenz curve
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8586.1992.tb00538.x
DIFFERENCES IN NEEDS AND ASSESSMENT OF INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS*
resolves10.2307/2234376
Equivalence Scale Relativities and the Extent of Inequality and Poverty
resolves10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_15
Equivalence Scales and Inequality
resolves10.1162/0034653053970384
Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World)
resolves10.1093/wber/10.3.565
A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2458086
We Just Ran Twenty-Three Million Queries of the World Bank's Website
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2366968
The Geography of Inequality: Where and by How Much Has Income Distribution Changed Since 1990?
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-7432
A Global Count of the Extreme Poor in 2012: Data Issues, Methodology and Initial Results
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2602268
Who Got What, Then and Now? A Fifty Year Overview from the Global Consumption and Income Project
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2694624
The Middle Muddle: Conceptualizing and Measuring the Global Middle Class
resolves10.1007/s10888-015-9305-3
World income inequality databases: an assessment of WIID and SWIID
resolves10.2307/1912949
Functional Forms for Estimating the Lorenz Curve: A Reply
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-6719
Global Income Distribution: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to the Great Recession
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-6259
Global Income Inequality by the Numbers: In History and Now -An Overview-
resolves10.25071/1874-6322.23370
The Estimation of Poverty and Inequality through Parametric Estimation of Lorenz Curves: An Evaluation
resolves10.3386/w15433
Parametric Estimations of the World Distribution of Income
resolves10.2307/2235377
Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics
resolves10.2307/1912948
Functional Forms for Estimating the Lorenz Curve
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2685096
$1.90 Per Day: What Does it Say?
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-7252
Data Deprivation: Another Deprivation to End
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00614.x
Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1007/s10888-015-9312-4
PovcalNet, WDI and ‘All the Ginis’: a critical review
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(89)90089-4
Elliptical Lorenz curves
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedThe Impact of Equivalence Scales on the Analysis of Income and Food Spending Distributions
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedAnd 1993: First Calculation Based On Household Surveys Alone
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedSensitivity Of Turkish Income Distributions to Choice of Equivalence Scale
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2480636"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2480636/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2480636/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2480636)