Reference health
Customer Integration in New Product Development: A Literature Review Concerning the Appropriateness of Different Customer Integration Methods to Attain Customer Knowledge
1 of 41 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-09-09
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1996.9702100315
The 40 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1142/s1363919609002224
ENABLING OPEN INNOVATION PROCESS THROUGH INTERACTIVE METHODS: SCENARIOS AND GROUP DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
resolves10.1109/hicss.2010.157
Does Collaboration among Participants Lead to Better Ideas in IT-Based Idea Competitions? An Empirical Investigation
resolves10.1007/978-0-387-87503-3_28
Community for Innovations: Developing an Integrated Concept for Open Innovation
resolves10.1177/147078539603800208
Exploring the Atmosphere Created by Focus Group Interviews: Comparing Consumers' Feelings across Qualitative Techniques
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00564.x
Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations
resolves10.1111/1468-2370.00075
Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature
resolves10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00094.x
Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2006.09.005
Virtual product experience and customer participation—A chance for customer-centred, really new products
resolves10.1007/978-3-8349-8051-9_18
Qual der Wahl — Welche Methode führt zu kundenorientierten Innovationen?
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00589.x
Communitition: The Tension between Competition and Collaboration in Community‐Based Design Contests
resolves10.1080/0954412989333
Customer, consumer and user involvement in product development: A framework and a review of selected methods
resolves10.2753/mis0742-1222260108
Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171
Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00362.x
The Lead User method: an outline of empirical findings and issues for future research
resolves10.1108/08858620310463051
The potential influence of organizational and personal variables on customer‐oriented selling
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00432.x
Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development
resolves10.1109/hicss.2004.1265486
Customers as part of value Webs: towards a framework for webbed customer innovation tools
resolves10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x
The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model
resolves10.1016/0003-6870(85)90092-4
User-oriented product development applied to functional clothing design
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2005.05.005
Linking innovative product development with customer knowledge: a data-mining approach
resolves10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
“Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation
resolves10.1109/picmet.2006.296621
Efficient Identification of Leading-Edge Expertise: Screening vs. Pyramiding
resolves10.2753/jec1086-4415150101
Co-Creation: Toward a Taxonomy and an Integrated Research Perspective
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedRequirements Engineering for Product Service Systems -A State of the Art Analysis
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedThe Era of Open Innovation
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedProduct Development -Managing a Dispersed Process
no DOI — not checkedWhy most new consumer brands fail
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedReadings Packet on the Information Pump
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedAnalyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review
no DOI — not checkedref57
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2485240"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2485240/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2485240)