Reference health

Replication and the Manufacture of Scientific Inferences: A Formal Approach

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2496670
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 47 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-04

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1017/s1049096500057619
does not resolve to a known work10.1017/s1049096500057607
The 45 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1017/s1049096501001093
Choosing Reliable Statistical Software
resolves10.1177/1745691614529796
Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00109
Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
resolves10.1177/1464993413490480
Replication of quantitative work in development studies: Experiences and suggestions
resolves10.1080/00031305.1990.10475717
A Hope for the Future of Statistics: MSOD
resolves10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
An introduction to ROC analysis
resolves10.1080/02691729308578695
The market for (ir)reproducible econometrics
resolves10.2307/1174772
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
resolves10.1145/1852786.1852790
Replications types in experimental disciplines
resolves10.1016/s0927-5371(97)00015-8
Some thoughts on replications and reviews
resolves10.1136/bmj.d5928
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511790423
Probability Theory
resolves10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01538.x
An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests
resolves10.1177/0049124107306660
An Introduction to the Dataverse Network as an Infrastructure for Data Sharing
resolves10.1080/00031305.1993.10475983
The Design of Replicated Studies
resolves10.1080/00913367.1995.10673490
How Journal Editors View Replication Research
resolves10.3102/0013189X14545513
Facts Are More Important Than Novelty
resolves10.1177/2053168014559094
Democracy is good for the poor: A procedural replication of Ross (2006)
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2304970
A Unified Approach to Generalized Causal Inference
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2302735
Definition and Diagnosis of Problematic Attrition in Randomized Controlled Experiments
resolves10.1177/0002716209351519
Theory, External Validity, and Experimental Inference: Some Conjectures
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-7-30
The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0067460
LabTrove: A Lightweight, Web Based, Laboratory “Blog” as a Route towards a Marked Up Record of Work in a Bioscience Research Laboratory
resolves10.1080/09538259100000040
Why econometricians don't replicate (although they do reproduce)
resolves10.1177/109821400302400303
Fidelity Criteria: Development, Measurement, and Validation
resolves10.2307/2981525
Statistics, Science and Technology
resolves10.1080/00031305.1996.10474398
The Power of Replications and Replications of Power
resolves10.1016/0004-3702(88)90015-x
Embracing causality in default reasoning
resolves10.1093/biomet/82.4.669
Causal diagrams for empirical research
resolves10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1992.1.192744
Experimental Reproducibility and the Experimenters’ Regress
resolves10.1086/209375
Inductive Inference and Replications: A Bayesian Perspective
resolves10.1198/000313001317098220
Replicating Effects and Biases
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00220.x
Is Democracy Good for the Poor?
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537
Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials
resolves10.1037/a0015108
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences
resolves10.1080/13501780500086081
Artificiality: The tension between internal and external validity in economic experiments
resolves10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02234.x
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research
resolves10.1177/1745691614528518
Expectations for Replications
resolves10.1201/b16868
Implementing Reproducible Research
resolves10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6
Replication in Prevention Science
resolves10.1097/ede.0b013e3181ba333c
On the Distinction Between Interaction and Effect Modification
resolves10.2471/BLT.07.045120
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies*
resolves10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00506.x
Deming, Data and Observational Studies
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedA Clinician's Tool for Analyzing Non-compliance
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedCheck the numbers: The case for due diligence in policy formation
no DOI — not checkedEditorial bias against replication research
no DOI — not checkedReviewer bias against replication research
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedThe Do-Calculus Revisited
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedReplication in behavioral research
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedThe Relationship Between ISO 9000 and Business Performance: Does Registration Really Matter
no DOI — not checkedStan: A C++ Library for Probability and Sampling
no DOI — not checkedFour types of effect modification: A classification based on directed acyclic graphs
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-04 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2496670"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2496670/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2496670/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2496670)