Reference health

The Judicial Review of the European Union Industrial Cartels

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2536212
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 24 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-29

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1787/eco_surveys-eur-2012-graph30-en
The 23 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1192/bjp.82.340.687-b
<i>Ibid., Nos.</i> 3–4, <i>pp.</i> 85–116
resolves10.5553/eelc/187791072018003003019
ECJ 11 July 2018, case C-356/15 (EC – v – Belgium), Social insurance
resolves10.1142/9789814556989_0006
EU Membership and Corruption
resolves10.5771/9783845213323-305
Eastern Enlargement in Perspective: A Comparative View on EC/EU Enlargements
resolves10.4000/gc.3311
Géographie des objets
resolves10.1108/aeat.2006.12778bad.005
Nexans on board Venus Express
resolves10.4337/9781847205308.00009
Latest ECJ Rulings on the Freedom of Establishment in the Context of EC Company Law Developments
resolves10.2307/40405002
Dudleio Buck
resolves10.5040/9781472564979.ch-021
The EC External Competencies: From the ERTA Case to the Opinion in the Lugano Convention
resolves10.1163/2210-7886_asc-38354
38354, 1878-05-06
resolves10.5553/eelc/187791072018003003018
ECJ 11 July 2018, C-60/17 (Somoza Hermo), Transfer of undertakings
resolves10.1007/978-3-322-99378-6_29
Der Grüne Punkt — Duales System Deutschland AG
resolves10.1163/2210-7886_asc-30210
30210, 1868-02-08
resolves10.3726/978-3-653-05942-7/11
7. Main Trends in ECJ Case Law
resolves10.1016/s1365-6937(14)70397-1
FLSmidth &amp; Co, Denmark
resolves10.1093/jeclap/lpu098
Justice Denied or Simply Delayed? Consequences of Excessive Delay at the EU's General Court
resolves10.18352/ulr.302
Institutional Design of Enforcement in the EU: The Case of Financial Markets
resolves10.1093/jeclap/lpt083
From Regulation 1 to Regulation 2: National Enforcement of EU Cartel Prohibition and the Need for Further Convergence
resolves10.1093/jaenfo/jnt017
The UK response to the global effort against cartels: is criminalization really the solution?
resolves10.1145/1596685.1596819
Toshiba "time sculpture"
resolves10.1055/b-0035-106254
30.12 ANCA-assoziierte Vaskulitiden (AAV) ANCA = antineutrophile zytoplasmatische Antikörper assoziierte Vaskulitiden ANCA-assoziierte Vaskulitiden AAV = ANCA-assoziierte Vaskulitiden
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedjoined cases C-247/11 P and C-253/11 P, Areva and others v EC
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedFor the principle ne bis in idem applied to administrative sanctions, see e.g. Andreangeli, Ne Bis in Idem and Administrative Sanctions: Bonda
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedFor a recent survey, see Oliver/Bambois, Competition and Fundamental Rights Survey
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedA Statistical Analysis of U.K. Antitrust Enforcement
no DOI — not checkedFor a recent contribution asking what is a reasonable time by looking at the complexity of the case, conduct of the parties and the GC's workload, see Jenkins/Bushell, (fn. 234), p. 12; also, see Scheidtmann, Haste Makes Waste(?) -Some Reflections on the European Court of Justice's Approach to Remedying Infringements of the General Court regarding the Right to be Heard Within a Reasonable Time
no DOI — not checked48-55; for nine years and seven months, see e.g. ECtHR, no. 10527/83, Milasi v Italy, paras. 14-20; for five years and eleven months, see ECtHR, no. 50268/99, Rouille v France, para. 29; for twelve years and seven months, see ECtHR
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedECLI:EU:C:1989:387, para. 34 et seq.; also, see ECtHR
no DOI — not checkedOpinion of AG Maz�k, case C-360/09
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2536212"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2536212/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2536212/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2536212)