Reference health
What Do Consumers Use 3D Printers For?
34/34 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 34 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/orsc.1100.0618
Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012
How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study
resolves10.1177/0149206309353944
Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.002
User innovation and entrepreneurship in the virtual world: A study of Second Life residents
resolves10.1108/13552540610670717
Advances in three dimensional printing – state of the art and future perspectives
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00049-0
Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2006.09.005
Virtual product experience and customer participation—A chance for customer-centred, really new products
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1
Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.010
User community vs. producer innovation development efficiency: A first empirical study
resolves10.1016/j.tele.2013.09.006
Commons-based peer production and digital fabrication: The case of a RepRap-based, Lego-built 3D printing-milling machine
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00362.x
The Lead User method: an outline of empirical findings and issues for future research
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.005
User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking
resolves10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1513.12076
Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market
resolves10.1108/03090569810232237
Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing
resolves10.1177/0163443712449497
Democratizing production through open source knowledge: from open software to open hardware
resolves10.1115/1.2900701
Three Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model
resolves10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00895-5
Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation
resolves10.1504/ijpd.2005.008005
The process of user-innovation: a case study in a consumer goods setting
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1508
Comparing Business and Household Sector Innovation in Consumer Products: Findings from a Representative Study in the United Kingdom
resolves10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002
Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedOpen source beyond software: An empirical investigation of the open design phenomenon
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedHow to Make Almost Anything: The Digital Fabrication Revolution
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedThe age of the consumerinnovator
no DOI — not checkedref51
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2547528"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2547528/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2547528)