Reference health

Preference for Dividends and Return Comovement

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2565277
CiteStamped reference-health badge
37/37 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-21

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 37 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00298
A Theory of Dividends Based on Tax Clienteles
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00658.x
A Catering Theory of Dividends
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00064-3
Style investing
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.04.003
Comovement
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01645.x
Local Dividend Clienteles
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01633.x
Style‐Related Comovement: Fundamentals or Labels?
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.07.004
Payout policy in the 21st century
resolves10.1111/j.1755-053X.2008.00027.x
Managerial Response to the May 2003 Dividend Tax Cut
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.05.007
Comovement revisited
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm038
Turning over Turnover
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00092-1
Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03721.x
Dividend Policy and Financial Distress: An Empirical Investigation of Troubled NYSE Firms
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.013
Institutional tax clienteles and payout policy
resolves10.2307/1927599
Marginal Stockholder Tax Rates and the Clientele Effect
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00038-1
Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhx015
Fund Flows and Market States
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01336.x
Earnings Management and Firm Performance Following Open‐Market Repurchases
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhg033
Taxes and Corporate Finance: A Review
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00873.x
Do Dividend Clienteles Exist? Evidence on Dividend Preferences of Retail Investors
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.002
Price-based return comovement
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm052
Excess Comovement of Stock Returns: Evidence from Cross-Sectional Variation in Nikkei 225 Weights
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.04.001
Juicing the dividend yield: Mutual funds and the demand for dividends
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn073
Disappearing Dividends, Catering, and Risk
resolves10.1093/rfs/hht043
Investor Heterogeneity, Investor-Management Disagreement and Share Repurchases
resolves10.2307/2331319
Do Investors Ignore Dividend Taxation? A Reexamination of the Citizens Utilities Case
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.008
Understanding commonality in liquidity around the world
resolves10.1093/rfs/13.2.257
Trading Volume: Definitions, Data Analysis, and Implications of Portfolio Theory
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(78)90031-4
The market valuation of cash dividends
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhs103
A Flow-Based Explanation for Return Predictability
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04796.x
Price Reactions to Dividend Initiations and Omissions: Overreaction or Drift?
resolves10.1086/294442
Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(86)90028-0
The market valuation of cash dividends
resolves10.1257/0002828041301416
Taxation and Corporate Payout Policy
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(84)90025-4
Explaining investor preference for cash dividends
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01751.x
Mutual Fund Tax Clienteles
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.001
The short of it: Investor sentiment and anomalies
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDividend taxes and corporate behaviour: evidence from the 2003 dividend tax cut
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedThe dividend clientele hypothesis: evidence from the 2003 tax act
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-21 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2565277"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2565277/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2565277/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2565277)