Reference health

Identifying Criminals’ Risk Preferences

CiteStamped reference-health badge
25/25 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-14

Every reference with a DOI or an arXiv id in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

22 with no DOI or arXiv id: not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is checked only when it names an arXiv id, under that id’s DataCite DOI. The rest are never matched by title or guessed at; they stay outside the checked set, and this line says so.

The 25 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/978-1-4020-6754-9_6557
Gene-For-Gene
resolves10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01171.x
Fairness and the Willingness to Accept Plea Bargain Offers
resolves10.1007/s12232-008-0055-4
Referees for volume 55/2008
resolves10.1093/benz/9780199773787.article.b00113841
Magaard, Valdemar Holger V. Rasmusen
resolves10.1075/itl.37.05mis
<i>A Note on Supra-Syntactic Interference</i>
resolves10.1525/fsr.2014.26.4.227
Excerpts from Proposed 2014 Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines
resolves10.2307/j.ctt1hch7t1.50
Funk You Up
resolves10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00231-1
A socio-economic model of stigma and related social problems
resolves10.1086/259646
The Optimum Enforcement of Laws
resolves10.1007/s10623-017-0331-y
Editor’s note
resolves10.2202/1555-5879.1011
A Simple Theory of Increasing Penalties for Repeat Offenders
resolves10.2307/2601054
Reasonable Doubt and the Optimal Magnitude of Fines: Should the Penalty Fit the Crime?
resolves10.2307/840821
A Comparative View of Standards of Proof
resolves10.1628/0932456054193658
Deterrence versus Judicial Error: A Comparative View of Standards of Proof
resolves10.1086/664614
On the Optimal Burden of Proof
resolves10.1257/aer.101.3.277
Optimal Proof Burdens, Deterrence, and the Chilling of Desirable Behavior
resolves10.2202/1555-5879.1237
Prevention of Crime and the Optimal Standard of Proof in Criminal Law
resolves10.1016/0144-8188(91)90022-6
Optimal criminal procedure: Fairness and deterrence
resolves10.1007/s11127-011-9867-y
Better that ten guilty persons escape: punishment costs explain the standard of evidence
resolves10.1111/1540-5982.00136
A model of evidence production and optimal standard of proof and penalty in criminal trials
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1430281
Better that Ten Guilty Persons Escape: Punishment Costs Explain the Standard of Evidence
resolves10.5040/9781472560490.ch-004
William Blackstone and William Prynne : An Unlikely Association?
resolves10.3386/w4868
A Note on Subsidizing Gifts
resolves10.1515/9783110840308-067
Backmatter
The 22 references with no DOI or arXiv id, listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedDeterrence with Multiple Defendants: An Explanation for "Unfair" Plea Bargains
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedPlea bargaining makes a substantial part of an offender's sentence depend, not upon what he did or his personal characteristics, but upon a tactical decision irrelevant to any proper objective of criminal proceedings. In contested cases, it substitutes a regime of split-the-difference for a judicial determination of guilt or innocence and elevates a concept of partial guilt above the requirement that criminal responsibility be established beyond a reasonable doubt. This practice also deprecates the value of human liberty and the purposes of the criminal sanction by treating these things as commodities to be traded for economic savings-savings that
no DOI — not checkedBjerk, supra note 113, at 2. 118. There is an expanding law and economics literature on stigmatization and how it affects optimal law enforcement strategies. See, e.g., Alon Harel & Alon Klement, The Economics of Stigma: Why More Detection of Crime May Result in Less Stigmatization
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedRepeat Offenders: If They Learn, We Punish Them More Severely, 30 INT'L REV
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedBurden of Proof, 121 YALE L
no DOI — not checkedA Utilitarian Justification for Heightened Standards of Proof in Criminal Trials
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedA Public Choice Theory of Criminal Procedure, 15 SUPREME CT
no DOI — not checkedref49
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references with neither a DOI nor an arXiv id.

checked 2026-10-14 — re-checked at most once a day, when someone opens this page, so the date shown is the last check; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge shows the date of its last check, which runs at most once a day, when someone opens this page.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2567048"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2567048/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2567048/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2567048)