Reference health
Identifying Criminals’ Risk Preferences
25/25 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-14
Every reference with a DOI or an arXiv id in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
22 with no DOI or arXiv id: not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is checked only when it names an arXiv id, under that id’s DataCite
DOI. The rest are never matched by title or guessed at; they stay outside the checked set, and
this line says so.
The 25 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2601054Reasonable Doubt and the Optimal Magnitude of Fines: Should the Penalty Fit the Crime?
resolves10.1111/1540-5982.00136A model of evidence production and optimal standard of proof and penalty in criminal trials
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1430281Better that Ten Guilty Persons Escape: Punishment Costs Explain the Standard of Evidence
The 22 references with no DOI or arXiv id, listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedDeterrence with Multiple Defendants: An Explanation for "Unfair" Plea Bargains
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedPlea bargaining makes a substantial part of an offender's sentence depend, not upon what he did or his personal characteristics, but upon a tactical decision irrelevant to any proper objective of criminal proceedings. In contested cases, it substitutes a regime of split-the-difference for a judicial determination of guilt or innocence and elevates a concept of partial guilt above the requirement that criminal responsibility be established beyond a reasonable doubt. This practice also deprecates the value of human liberty and the purposes of the criminal sanction by treating these things as commodities to be traded for economic savings-savings that
no DOI — not checkedBjerk, supra note 113, at 2. 118. There is an expanding law and economics literature on stigmatization and how it affects optimal law enforcement strategies. See, e.g., Alon Harel & Alon Klement, The Economics of Stigma: Why More Detection of Crime May Result in Less Stigmatization
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedRepeat Offenders: If They Learn, We Punish Them More Severely, 30 INT'L REV
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedBurden of Proof, 121 YALE L
no DOI — not checkedA Utilitarian Justification for Heightened Standards of Proof in Criminal Trials
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedA Public Choice Theory of Criminal Procedure, 15 SUPREME CT
no DOI — not checkedref49
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
with neither a DOI nor an arXiv id.
checked 2026-10-14 — re-checked at most once a day, when someone opens
this page, so the date shown is the last check; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not
part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge shows the date of its last check, which runs at most once a day, when someone opens this page.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2567048"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2567048/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2567048)