Reference health

Do Negative Emotions Explain Punishment in Power-to-Take Game Experiments?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2576278
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 35 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0003-066x.38.11.1145
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.267
The 33 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2013.12.005
From dual processes to multiple selves: Implications for economic behavior
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2007.02.005
Reciprocity and emotions in bargaining using physiological and self-report measures
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.0j677
Emotional Hazard in a Power‐to‐Take Experiment
resolves10.1007/s10683-006-4310-9
Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2004.12.005
The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2013.01.004
Dual-process theories of decision-making: A selective survey
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2005.05.004
The demand for punishment
resolves10.1007/s10683-010-9266-0
Framing and free riding: emotional responses and punishment in social dilemma games
resolves10.1126/science.1100735
The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003
A theory of sequential reciprocity
resolves10.1038/415137a
Altruistic punishment in humans
resolves10.1162/003355399556151
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
resolves10.1177/05390184070460030112
What might emotions be? Comments on the Comments
resolves10.2307/2296467
On Experimental Research in Oligopoly
resolves10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002
“My Questionnaire is Too Long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02288.x
The Importance of Emotions for the Effectiveness of Social Punishment
resolves10.4284/0038-4038-2012.067
Emotions, Sanctions, and Cooperation
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.002
Emotions in tournaments
resolves10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001
Emotion And Adaptation
resolves10.1257/aer.90.2.426
Emotions in Economic Theory and Economic Behavior
resolves10.1007/s10683-007-9171-3
A comparative statics analysis of punishment in public-good experiments
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511571299
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
resolves10.1016/b978-0-12-374176-9.00016-6
The Study of Emotion in Neuroeconomics
resolves10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001
Affective Computing
resolves10.1006/obhd.1996.0100
Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers
resolves10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.012
Social ties and coordination on negative reciprocity: The role of affect
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2010.08.001
Fairness perceptions and prosocial emotions in the power to take
resolves10.2139/ssrn.954862
The Role of Emotion in Economic Behavior
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2012.08.007
Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load
resolves10.1007/s10683-009-9217-9
Gender pairing and bargaining—Beware the same sex!
resolves10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z
Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedParticipation and decision making: a three-person powerto-take experiment
no DOI — not checkedCooperation in public-goods experiments: kindness or confusion?
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedAn experiment of waiting time and punishing behavior
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref42
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2576278"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2576278/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2576278/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2576278)