Reference health
Do Technology Leaders Deter Inward R&D Investments? Evidence from Regional R&D Location Decisions in Europe
4 of 86 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-10-07
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/256688
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1990.4310825
does not resolve to a known work10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::aid-jae570>3.3.co;2-t
does not resolve to a known work10.1787/iip-2007-8-en
The 82 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/smj.792
Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility
resolves10.1016/s0167-7187(03)00081-x
The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems
resolves10.1093/icc/dtl034
Desperately seeking spillovers? Increasing returns, industrial organization and the location of new entrants in geographic and technological space
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1060.0658
Location Choices Across the Value Chain: How Activity and Capability Influence Collocation
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2205180
Spatial Organization of Firms: Internal and External Agglomeration Economies and Location Choices through the Value Chain
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1451
Local R&D Strategies and Multilocation Firms: The Role of Internal Linkages
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400306
Patent rights and innovative activity: evidence from national and firm-level data
resolves10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905
Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks
resolves10.1080/09654310600933314
Where Do Firms Choose to Locate Their R&D? A Spatial Conditional Logit Analysis on French Data
resolves10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.08.006
Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: The role of EU cohesion policy
resolves10.1093/jeg/lbn017
Getting there fast: globalization, intercontinental flights and location of headquarters
resolves10.1006/jjie.2001.0491
The Location of Japanese Investments in China: Agglomeration Effects, Keiretsu, and Firm Heterogeneity
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00120-1
Overseas innovations by Japanese firms: an analysis of patent and subsidiary data
resolves10.1002/smj.294
Entry mode, organizational learning, and R&D in foreign affiliates: evidence from Japanese firms
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2437374
Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners
resolves10.1068/a45536
Academic Research Strengths and Multinational Firms' Foreign R&D Location Decisions: Evidence from R&D Investments in European Regions
resolves10.1016/s0014-2921(02)00307-0
Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data
resolves10.1080/0034340052000320824
Recent Location of Foreign-owned Research and Development Activities by Large Multinational Corporations in the European Regions: The Role of Spillovers and Externalities
resolves10.1002/gsj.24
Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises
resolves10.1080/00343409950081211
Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: Learning Versus Collective Learning Processes
resolves10.1080/0034340052000320851
Collective Learning and Relational Capital in Local Innovation Processes
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.003
Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature
resolves10.1002/smj.464
Types of firms generating network externalities and MNCs' co‐location decisions
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.12.1534.440
Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States
resolves10.3386/w7552
Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.011
Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.005
Knowledge protection strategies of multinational firms—A cross-country comparison
resolves10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.06.007
Functional fragmentation and the location of multinational firms in the enlarged Europe
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.003
Commuters and the regional assignment of innovative activities: A methodological patent study of German districts
resolves10.1002/smj.396
Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries
resolves10.1080/1366271032000141661
THE LOCATIONAL DYNAMICS OF THE US BIOTECH INDUSTRY: KNOWLEDGE EXTERNALITIES AND THE ANCHOR HYPOTHESIS
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9787.1992.tb00197.x
WHAT ATTRACTS FOREIGN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS? EVIDENCE FROM BRANCH PLANT LOCATION IN THE UNITED STATES
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00123-9
Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1
Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations
resolves10.1016/0022-1996(94)01351-r
Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States
resolves10.1080/00343400902783230
Agglomeration Economies and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment: Empirical Evidence from Romania
resolves10.2307/2118401
Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00102-x
Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: the case of US and Japanese corporations
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00088-3
Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries
resolves10.2307/2109992
Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and Financing
resolves10.1016/s0014-2921(98)00031-2
Growing locations: Industry location in a model of endogenous growth
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00259.x
The Location Behavior of the Multinational Enterprise: Some Analytical Issues
resolves10.1068/a37311
Analytical Differences in the Economics of Geography: The Case of the Multinational Firm
resolves10.1080/00343400120101434
Patents and the Geographic Localization of R&D Spillovers in French Manufacturing
resolves10.1162/003465398557735
Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level
resolves10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:12<1175::AID-SMJ139>3.0.CO;2-Q
Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.010
What determines overseas R&D activities? The case of Japanese multinational firms
resolves10.1287/mnsc.49.4.351.14429
Learning–by–Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer?
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(94)00810-8
Regional technology coalitions an essential dimension of national technology policy
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy
resolves10.1080/10438599700000006
University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1060.0516
Conducting R&D in Countries with Weak Intellectual Property Rights Protection
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1000455
Global Competitors as Next-Door Neighbors: Competition and Geographic Concentration in the Semiconductor Industry
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedR&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedContrasts in agglomeration: New york and pittsburgh
no DOI — not checkedDistance still matters
no DOI — not checkedPatent statistics as economic indicators: a survey
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedConditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
no DOI — not checkedref84
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedref101
no DOI — not checkedref104
no DOI — not checkedref105
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-10-07 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2577821"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2577821/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2577821)