Reference health
Kuznets Inverted U Hypothesis of Income Inequality: Looking Inside the Available Economic Literature
1 of 71 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
23 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2276207
The 70 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/jel.39.3.771
Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of “Secondary” Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study
resolves10.1080/13504850600749040
Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis revisited: a time-series approach using US data
resolves10.1353/sof.2010.0042
How Socio-Economic Change Shapes Income Inequality in Post-Socialist Europe
resolves10.1111/1467-9892.00091
Error‐correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single‐equation Framework
resolves10.1007/s10290-011-0107-9
International trade and income distribution: reconsidering the evidence
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2007.01.013
Development and inequality: Evidence from an endogenous switching regression without regime separation
resolves10.1007/s11205-016-1435-x
Understanding the Kuznets Process—An Empirical Investigation of Income Inequality in China: 1978–2011
resolves10.5089/9781451848281.001
Income Distribution and Tax and Government Social Spending Policies in Developing Countries
resolves10.1080/00220380701384406
The personal and the factor distributions of income in a cross-section of countries
resolves10.1111/j.1475-4991.2005.00147.x
ESTIMATING THE INEQUALITY OF HOUSEHOLD INCOMES: A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO THE CREATION OF A DENSE AND CONSISTENT GLOBAL DATA SET
resolves10.3386/w7224
Explaining Inequality the World Round: Cohort Size, Kuznets Curves, andOpenness
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(94)01664-l
Identifying restrictions of linear equations with applications to simultaneous equations and cointegration
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE ON COINTEGRATION — WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DEMAND FOR MONEY
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9361.2007.00388.x
Trade Liberalization and Wage Inequality: Evidence from India
resolves10.12720/joams.2.1.33-37
Exploring the Two-Way Relationship between Income Inequality and Growth
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00569.x
With or Without U? The Appropriate Test for a U-Shaped Relationship*
resolves10.1080/13504850150204093
Using non-parametrics to inform parametric tests of Kuznets' hypothesis
resolves10.2307/1926661
The International Comparison of Size Distribution of Family Incomes with Special Reference to Asia
resolves10.1016/s0304-4076(97)00049-3
Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables
resolves10.1016/0305-750x(88)90211-2
Economic development and income inequality: Further evidence on the U-curve hypothesis
resolves10.1016/s0306-9192(00)00011-7
Prices, wages and poverty in rural India: what lessons do the time series data hold for policy?
resolves10.1007/s12076-013-0106-7
Urbanization and expenditure inequality in Indonesia: testing the Kuznets hypothesis with provincial panel data
resolves10.1016/j.asieco.2008.07.002
Globalization and economic inequality in the short and long run: The case of South Korea 1975–1995
resolves10.1108/03068291011060652
Income inequality‐economic growth and non‐linearity: a case of Pakistan
resolves10.1057/9780230520318_18
Growth, Inequality and Structural Adjustment: An Empirical Interpretation of the S-Curve for the Indian Economy
resolves10.1080/135048501750041213
The Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis: panel data evidence from 96 countries
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2011.07.013
Inequality and development: Evidence from semiparametric estimation with panel data
The 23 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedUnderstanding income inequality: Concept, causes and measurement
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedEconomic growth and income inequality
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedIncome distribution at different levels of development: A survey of evidence
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedThe Welfare Basis of Real Income Comparisons: A Survey
no DOI — not checkedref85
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref90
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2591284"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2591284/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2591284)