Reference health

Disagreement la Taylor: Evidence from Survey Microdata

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2598401
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 21 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-07

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1093/sf/53.3.468
The 20 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3386/w12648
Learning and Disagreement in an Uncertain World
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2531343
Fundamental Disagreement
resolves10.1177/0049124100028003001
Statistics of Ordinal Variation
resolves10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.04.013
Do people understand monetary policy?
resolves10.1257/jel.37.4.1661
The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.009
A multivariate analysis of forecast disagreement: Confronting models of disagreement with survey data
resolves10.1162/rest_a_00207
Disagreement Among Forecasters in G7 Countries
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.033
Updating inflation expectations: Evidence from micro-data
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.02.002
Evolution of forecast disagreement in a Bayesian learning model
resolves10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.12.009
Learning and heterogeneity in GDP and inflation forecasts
resolves10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00534.x
The Role of Media for Inflation Forecast Disagreement of Households and Professional Forecasters
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1434795
On the Accuracy of the Probability Method for Quantifying Beliefs About Inflation
resolves10.1162/003355302320935034
Sticky Information versus Sticky Prices: A Proposal to Replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve
resolves10.1086/ma.18.3585256
Disagreement about Inflation Expectations
resolves10.1002/for.2340
Measuring Disagreement in Qualitative Expectations
resolves10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.07.001
Why do forecasters disagree? Lessons from the term structure of cross-sectional dispersion
resolves10.1016/s0304-3932(03)00029-1
Implications of rational inattention
resolves10.7551/mitpress/9780262013635.003.0009
Inflation Expectations, Uncertainty, the Phillips Curve, and Monetary Policy
resolves10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l
Discretion versus policy rules in practice
resolves10.3386/w8673
Imperfect Common Knowledge and the Effects of Monetary Policy
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-07 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2598401"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2598401/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2598401/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2598401)