Reference health
Who Can Predict Their Own Demise? Accuracy of Longevity Expectations by Education and Cognition
58/58 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-02
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 58 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00052.x
Understanding Pensions: Cognitive Function, Numerical Ability and Retirement Saving*
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02395.x
Cognitive Function, Numeracy and Retirement Saving Trajectories
resolves10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.008
Health status and health dynamics in an empirical model of expected longevity
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.009
Does everyone use probabilities? The role of cognitive skills
resolves10.1002/hec.3506
Individual survival curves comparing subjective and observed mortality risks
resolves10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
resolves10.1006/obhd.1999.2868
Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: “It's a Fifty–Fifty Chance”
resolves10.1007/s13524-011-0066-8
Differential Survival in Europe and the United States: Estimates Based on Subjective Probabilities of Survival
resolves10.1080/01621459.1997.10474041
Using Expectations Data to Study Subjective Income Expectations
resolves10.1007/s13524-012-0164-2
The Predictive Validity of Subjective Mortality Expectations: Evidence From the Health and Retirement Study
resolves10.1002/jae.1224
When Kahneman meets Manski: Using dual systems of reasoning to interpret subjective expectations of equity returns
resolves10.1287/deca.2013.0266
Estimating Second Order Probability Beliefs from Subjective Survival Data
resolves10.2307/146285
Evaluation of the Subjective Probabilities of Survival in the Health and Retirement Study
resolves10.1002/jae.2321
ROUNDING, FOCAL POINT ANSWERS AND NONRESPONSE TO SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY QUESTIONS
resolves10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.08.008
The role of education in complex health decisions: Evidence from cancer screening
resolves10.7826/isr-um.06.585031.001.05.0010.2005
Documentation of Cognitive Functioning Measures in the Health and Retirement Study
resolves10.1353/dem.2008.0010
Using subjective expectations to forecast longevity: do survey respondents know something we don’t know?
resolves10.2307/2529588
Regression Analysis of Grouped Survival Data with Application to Breast Cancer Data
resolves10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.010
The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003
The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography
resolves10.1159/000070409
Self-Rated Life Expectancy as a Predictor of Mortality: Evidence from the HRS and AHEAD Surveys
resolves10.7826/isr-um.06.585031.001.05.0005.2000
Documentation of Affective Functioning Measures in the Health and Retirement Study
resolves10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.011
Conjugal bereavement effects on health and mortality at advanced ages
resolves10.1093/geronb/53B.1.S28
Can Parental Longevity and Self-Rated Life Expectancy Predict Mortality among Older Persons? Results from an Australian Cohort
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2012.02.007
Probabilistic survey questions and incorrect answers: Retirement income replacement rates
resolves10.1177/0272989x07303824
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMemory in the Aging Brain
no DOI — not checkedThe Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status
no DOI — not checkedSarafidis (forthcoming) 'Dynamic Panel Data Models
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedMini-Mental State: A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician'
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedSubjective Survival Curves and Life Cycle Behavior
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedEpisodic and Semantic Memory
no DOI — not checkedAdaptive Responses to Chemical Labeling: Are Workers Bayesian Decision Makers?
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedDeaths: Final Data for
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedModel also includes gender specific age-year dummy variables. Standard errors allowing for clustering at the individual level in parentheses. *, ** and *** indicate significance at 10%, 5% and 1% respectively
no DOI — not checkedref76
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-02 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2604021"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2604021/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2604021)