Reference health

Open or Closed? Technology Sharing, Supplier Investment, and Competition

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2630477
CiteStamped reference-health badge
10/10 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

26 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 10 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1395
Stochastic Capacity Investment and Flexible vs. Dedicated Technology Choice in Imperfect Capital Markets
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1353
Mixed Source
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1050.0369
Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1060.0549
Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1060.0561
Introduction of New Technologies to Competing Industrial Customers
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1060.0611
Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.3.313.7728
Technology Selection and Commitment in New Product Development: The Role of Uncertainty and Design Flexibility
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.001
Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework
resolves10.1287/msom.2013.0438
Dynamic Capacity Investment with Two Competing Technologies
resolves10.4159/9780674044999
The Success of Open Source
The 26 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of budget constraints on flexible vs. dedicated technology choice
no DOI — not checkedDynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedResearch: 5 companies positioned to succeed in grid-scale energy storage
no DOI — not checked286065-why-the-ibm-pc-had-an-open-architecture
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref36
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2630477"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2630477/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2630477/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2630477)