Reference health
Understanding Social Preferences Regarding the Prioritisation of Treatments Addressing Unmet Need and Severity
10/10 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-08
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 10 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/hec.924
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature
resolves10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.020
Investigating public preferences on ‘severity of health’ as a relevant condition for setting healthcare priorities
resolves10.1002/hec.1414
Exploring the social value of health‐care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment
resolves10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00061.x
Public involvement in health care priority setting: an economic perspective
resolves10.3310/hta5050
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques
resolves10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00182.x
Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidence
resolves10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.08.005
Severity of illness and priority setting in healthcare: A review of the literature
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2634009
Valuing Health at the End of Life: An Exploratory Preference Elicitation Study
resolves10.2165/00019053-200725080-00006
A Stated Preference Binary Choice Experiment to Explore NICE Decision Making
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedon the conditional marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
no DOI — not checkedSocietal views on NICE, cancer drugs fund and valuebased pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: A cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great Britain
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2633405"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2633405/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2633405)