Reference health
Women Don’t Mean Business? Gender Penalty in Board Composition
2 of 46 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/256611
The 44 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/smj.1955
Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation
resolves10.2307/2095101
The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields
resolves10.1086/229939
Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2315
Bending the Pipeline? Executive Search and Gender Inequality in Hiring for Top Management Jobs
resolves10.1086/431448
Are Some Outside Directors Better than Others? Evidence from Director Appointments by Fortune 1000 Firms*
resolves10.2307/4131489
The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms
resolves10.5465/amj.2006.23478255
The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving Via Framing and Decoupling
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2229
The Impact of Stakeholder Orientation on Innovation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
resolves10.5465/ambpp.2016.301
Better in the Shadows? Media Coverage and Market Reactions to Female CEO Appointments
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00670.x
Investing with Prejudice: the Relationship Between Women's Presence on Company Boards and Objective and Subjective Measures of Company Performance
resolves10.1002/smj.495
Stacking the deck: the effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions
resolves10.1037/h0044025
Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups.
resolves10.1002/smj.2646
Higher Highs and Lower Lows: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in CEO Dismissal
resolves10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09599
Multivariate Matching Methods That Are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding
resolves10.1002/smj.2268
The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics
resolves10.2307/2667054
Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups
resolves10.5465/amj.2015.4011
Gender Research in
<i>AMJ</i>
: AN Overview of Five Decades of Empirical Research and Calls to Action
resolves10.2307/256871
COLLABORATION IN THE BOARDROOM: BEHAVIORAL AND PERFORMANCE CONSEQUENCES OF CEO-BOARD SOCIAL TIES.
resolves10.5465/amj.2010.48036721
A Matter of Appearances: How Corporate Leaders Manage the Impressions of Financial Analysts about the Conduct of Their Boards
resolves10.2307/2393593
The Symbolic Management of Stockholders: Corporate Governance Reforms and Shareholder Reactions
resolves10.5465/ambpp.2017.12601abstract
Paying for Mirrors or Windows? Consumer Discrimination and Hollywood Films
resolves10.1177/000312240406900306
The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions
resolves10.1177/0170840615593584
The Power of Diversity Discourses at Work: On the Interlocking Nature of Diversities and Occupations
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.
resolves10.2307/1164588
Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
resolves10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00043.x
Disadvantaged by Diversity? The Effects of Diversity Goals on Competence Perceptions
<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1002/smj.575
She'‐e‐os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCorporate Board Gender Diversity and Stock Performance: The Competence Gap or Institutional Investor Bias
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedIcahn, Loeb, and Other Activists Overlook Women for Board Seats
no DOI — not checkedDemography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40 Years of Research
no DOI — not checkedref40
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2637433"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2637433/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2637433)